IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001444.html

Public open space as a catalyst for income sorting in high-density urban areas: Evidence from Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ruiyang
  • Shi, Shuai
  • Wong, Siu Kei
  • Lu, Huan

Abstract

Due to housing affordability constraints, residents in high-density cities often have limited private residential space (PRS) and may seek proximity to public open space (POS) as a compensatory amenity. However, existing literature largely focuses on estimating the amenity value of POS without considering the trade-offs between PRS and POS across income groups. To address this gap, we develop a spatial equilibrium model (SEM) that disentangles these trade-offs by analysing the income and substitution effects in bidding behaviours for POS. Using 176,865 housing transactions in Hong Kong from 2017 to 2022, we find that higher-income households consistently outbid lower-income households for both POS and PRS, suggesting a link between POS distribution and income sorting. However, when mobility was restricted during the Covid-19 pandemic, lower-income households bid more aggressively for POS at the expense of PRS, indicating an unusual substitution effect. These findings shed light on the inequitable outcomes of amenity-driven bidding mechanisms in housing markets, highlighting implications for planning responses to mitigate housing inequality, particularly in high-density metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ruiyang & Shi, Shuai & Wong, Siu Kei & Lu, Huan, 2026. "Public open space as a catalyst for income sorting in high-density urban areas: Evidence from Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001444
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bo-Sin Tang & Kenneth KH Wong & Kenneth SS Tang & Siu Wai Wong, 2021. "Walking accessibility to neighbourhood open space in a multi-level urban environment of Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1340-1356, June.
    2. Sarina Dass & Daniel T. O’Brien & Alina Ristea, 2023. "Strategies and inequities in balancing recreation and COVID exposure when visiting green spaces," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(5), pages 1161-1177, June.
    3. Seung Kyum Kim & Longfeng Wu, 2022. "Do the characteristics of new green space contribute to gentrification?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 360-380, February.
    4. Shuai Shi & Siu Kei Wong & Ruiyang Wang & Chongyu Wang, 2024. "Does housing status matter? Evidence from Covid-19 infections in Hong Kong," International Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 316-343, April.
    5. Panduro, Toke Emil & Jensen, Cathrine Ulla & Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2018. "Eliciting preferences for urban parks," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 127-142.
    6. Triguero-Mas, Margarita & Anguelovski, Isabelle & García-Lamarca, Melissa & Argüelles, Lucía & Perez-del-Pulgar, Carmen & Shokry, Galia & Connolly, James J.T. & Cole, Helen V.S., 2021. "Natural outdoor environments’ health effects in gentrifying neighborhoods: Disruptive green landscapes for underprivileged neighborhood residents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    7. Allen Klaiber, H. & Phaneuf, Daniel J., 2010. "Valuing open space in a residential sorting model of the Twin Cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 57-77, September.
    8. Jan K. Brueckner & Jacques-François Thisse & Yves Zenou, 1999. "Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?," Post-Print hal-04103047, HAL.
    9. Ulrich B. Morawetz & H. Allen Klaiber, 2022. "Does housing policy impact income sorting near urban amenities? Evidence from Vienna, Austria," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 411-454, October.
    10. Brueckner, Jan K. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois & Zenou, Yves, 1999. "Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?: An amenity-based theory," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 91-107, January.
    11. Glaeser, Edward L. & Kahn, Matthew E. & Rappaport, Jordan, 2008. "Why do the poor live in cities The role of public transportation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Charles M. Tiebout, 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 64(5), pages 416-416.
    13. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Ho, Daniel C.W. & Chau, K.W. & Yu, Esther Y.T. & Lam, Cindy L.K. & Leung, Nixon T.H. & Davies, Stephen N.G., 2021. "Property rights & the perceived health contribution of public open space in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    14. Wang, Jie & Hu, Yecui & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2025. "Is green gentrification a pernicious paradox in the urban greening process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    15. Desen Lin & Shane T. Jensen & Susan M. Wachter, 2023. "The price effects of greening vacant lots: How neighborhood attributes matter," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 51(3), pages 573-610, May.
    16. Victor Couture & Cecile Gaubert & Jessie Handbury & Erik Hurst, 2024. "Income Growth and the Distributional Effects of Urban Spatial Sorting," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(2), pages 858-898.
    17. Siu Kei Wong & Ka Shing Cheung, 2020. "Housing price dispersion in the presale market," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 65-81, January.
    18. Isabelle Anguelovski & James J. T. Connolly & Helen Cole & Melissa Garcia-Lamarca & Margarita Triguero-Mas & Francesc Baró & Nicholas Martin & David Conesa & Galia Shokry & Carmen Pérez Pulgar & Lucia, 2022. "Green gentrification in European and North American cities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Daniel CW Ho & Lawrence WC Lai & Anqi Wang, 2021. "The effects of ‘publicness’ and quality of publicly accessible open space upon user satisfaction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 861-879, May.
    20. Anderson, Soren T. & West, Sarah E., 2006. "Open space, residential property values, and spatial context," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 773-789, November.
    21. Siru Lu & Chongyu Wang & Siu Kei Wong & Shuai Shi, 2023. "Is this time the same? Housing market performance during SARS and COVID-19," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 490-512, March.
    22. Heikkila, Eric J., 1996. "Are municipalities Tieboutian clubs?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 203-226, April.
    23. Liu, Tian & Hu, Weiyan & Song, Yan & Zhang, Anlu, 2020. "Exploring spillover effects of ecological lands: A spatial multilevel hedonic price model of the housing market in Wuhan, China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    24. Bin Chen & Shengbiao Wu & Yimeng Song & Chris Webster & Bing Xu & Peng Gong, 2022. "Contrasting inequality in human exposure to greenspace between cities of Global North and Global South," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    25. Yen, Barbara T.H. & Mulley, Corinne & Shearer, Heather, 2023. "The value of green infrastructure to property prices: Evidence from the Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ulrich B. Morawetz & H. Allen Klaiber, 2022. "Does housing policy impact income sorting near urban amenities? Evidence from Vienna, Austria," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 411-454, October.
    2. Gupta, Abhimanyu & Halket, Jonathan, 2023. "Household sorting in an ancient setting," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Pierre M. Picard & Thi Thu Huyen Tran, 2020. "A Welfare Evaluation of Green Urban Areas," DEM Discussion Paper Series 20-21, Department of Economics at the University of Luxembourg.
    4. Cheshire, Paul, 2009. "Policies for mixed communities: faith-based displacement activity?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30783, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Kuzey Yilmaz, 2026. "Two-worker Households, Decentralized Employment, and Residential Segregation," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 193-220, August.
    6. Mulalic, Ismir & Rouwendal, Jan, 2020. "Does improving public transport decrease car ownership? Evidence from a residential sorting model for the Copenhagen metropolitan area," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Hillis, Holly & Karwowski, Nicole, 2025. "The Impact of Conservation Easements on Housing Prices in US Counties," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361122, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Anupam Nanda & Jia-Huey Yeh, 2016. "Reflected Glory Versus Repulsive Envy: How Do the Smiths Feel About the House of the Joneses?," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 317-341, September.
    9. Rafa Madariaga & Joan Carles Martori & Ramon Oller, 2011. "Income, distance and spatial effects in the Monocentric model. The Barcelona Metropolitan Area case," ERSA conference papers ersa11p511, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Garcia-López, Miquel-Àngel & Moreno-Monroy, Ana I., 2018. "Income segregation in monocentric and polycentric cities: Does urban form really matter?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 62-79.
    11. Paul Cheshire & Stephen Sheppard, 2004. "Capitalising the Value of Free Schools: The Impact of Supply Characteristics and Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(499), pages 397-424, November.
    12. Pia Nilsson, 2017. "Are valuations of place-based amenities driven by scale?," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 449-469, May.
    13. C. Grislain-Letremy & J. Sixou & A. Sotura, 2024. "Urban Heat Islands and Inequalities: Evidence from French Cities," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers 2024-21, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    14. Francis Ostermeijer & Hans R A Koster & Jos van Ommeren & Victor Mayland Nielsen, 2022. "Automobiles and urban density [Urban spatial structure]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 22(5), pages 1073-1095.
    15. Leah Platt Boustan & Devin Michelle Bunten & Owen Hearey, 2013. "Urbanization in the United States, 1800-2000," NBER Working Papers 19041, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Lang, Corey & VanCeylon, Jarron, 2025. "Voting with their (left and right) feet: Are homebuyers’ values of neighborhood environmental amenities consistent with their politics?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    17. Schuetz, Jenny & Larrimore, Jeff & Merry, Ellen A. & Robles, Barbara J. & Tranfaglia, Anna & Gonzalez, Arturo, 2018. "Are central cities poor and non-white?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 83-94.
    18. Özge Öner, 2017. "Retail city: the relationship between place attractiveness and accessibility to shops," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 72-91, January.
    19. Gauvin, Laetitia & Vignes, Annick & Nadal, Jean-Pierre, 2013. "Modeling urban housing market dynamics: Can the socio-spatial segregation preserve some social diversity?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 1300-1321.
    20. Couture, Victor & Handbury, Jessie, 2020. "Urban revival in America," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.