IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001444.html

Public open space as a catalyst for income sorting in high-density urban areas: Evidence from Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Ruiyang
  • Shi, Shuai
  • Wong, Siu Kei
  • Lu, Huan

Abstract

Due to housing affordability constraints, residents in high-density cities often have limited private residential space (PRS) and may seek proximity to public open space (POS) as a compensatory amenity. However, existing literature largely focuses on estimating the amenity value of POS without considering the trade-offs between PRS and POS across income groups. To address this gap, we develop a spatial equilibrium model (SEM) that disentangles these trade-offs by analysing the income and substitution effects in bidding behaviours for POS. Using 176,865 housing transactions in Hong Kong from 2017 to 2022, we find that higher-income households consistently outbid lower-income households for both POS and PRS, suggesting a link between POS distribution and income sorting. However, when mobility was restricted during the Covid-19 pandemic, lower-income households bid more aggressively for POS at the expense of PRS, indicating an unusual substitution effect. These findings shed light on the inequitable outcomes of amenity-driven bidding mechanisms in housing markets, highlighting implications for planning responses to mitigate housing inequality, particularly in high-density metropolitan areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Ruiyang & Shi, Shuai & Wong, Siu Kei & Lu, Huan, 2026. "Public open space as a catalyst for income sorting in high-density urban areas: Evidence from Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001444
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001444
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.