IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001419.html

Sustainable livelihood in the Everest region of Nepal using the TEK framework

Author

Listed:
  • Mishra, Arindra Nath

Abstract

The fulfillment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) depends on the fine balance between livelihood and sustainable practices. Extant literature primarily focuses on sustainability from a policy perspective, and there is scant literature on grassroots-level practices that could be adopted to meet these goals. There is a wealth of knowledge trapped in the wisdom of generations that can be adopted to inform policy-making for a sustainable future. This study, embedded in the traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) framework, looks at the challenges of tourism-generated growth, livelihood, and social and environmental vulnerability of a primarily agro-pastoral economy located in the far reaches of the Himalayan mountains. The study employs qualitative exploration using immersive experience, interviews, and archival data to study the local community in the Mount Everest region (Solu-Khumbu) of Nepal. The findings demonstrate some key artifacts related to employment, food, water, housing, energy, and community development present some actionable insights. Additionally, the theoretical and practical implications of managing community-led development and preserving culture and environment are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Mishra, Arindra Nath, 2026. "Sustainable livelihood in the Everest region of Nepal using the TEK framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001419
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001419
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108057?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.