IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001390.html

Artificial intelligence in urban land use: How regional policy and institutional embeddedness shape the economic efficiency-social legitimacy paradox

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Shaofeng
  • Zhang, Hao

Abstract

Urban land use policy increasingly intersects with digital transformation strategies as cities worldwide pursue smart development agendas. This study examines how regional institutional frameworks—encompassing land use regulations, digital economy policies, and urban development priorities—shape the adoption and outcomes of artificial intelligence technologies among urban land users. Focusing on the hospitality sector as intensive urban land occupants operating under diverse regulatory regimes, we investigate how firms navigate institutional pressures while deploying AI-enabled service systems. Using structural equation modeling with data from 587 hotels across China, Europe, and the United States, complemented by 33 executive interviews, we reveal that regional institutional embeddedness creates paradoxical effects: while enhancing social legitimacy and stakeholder acceptance of technological change, it simultaneously constrains operational efficiency gains through conformity costs. Digital employee integration exhibits convex, J-curve-like trajectories within the observed data range for both efficiency and legitimacy outcomes, challenging linear assumptions about technology-driven land use optimization. These findings demonstrate that effective urban land use policy must account for the temporal dynamics and institutional trade-offs inherent in digital transformation, recognizing that rigid institutional alignment may impede the operational flexibility necessary for urban land users to maximize spatial productivity. The research offers policy guidance for governments seeking to balance innovation encouragement with social acceptance in urban development contexts, while revealing how place-based institutional strategies shape the economic geography of digital adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Shaofeng & Zhang, Hao, 2026. "Artificial intelligence in urban land use: How regional policy and institutional embeddedness shape the economic efficiency-social legitimacy paradox," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001390
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001390
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritala, Paavo & Aaltonen, Päivi & Ruokonen, Mika & Nemeh, Andre, 2024. "Developing industrial AI capabilities: An organisational learning perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Min‐Jae Lee & Anna Pak & Taewoo Roh, 2024. "The interplay of institutional pressures, digitalization capability, environmental, social, and governance strategy, and triple bottom line performance: A moderated mediation model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 5247-5268, September.
    3. André Hanelt & Sebastian Firk & Patryk Zapadka & Jana Oehmichen, 2025. "Artificial intelligence boundary resources: a relational view on leveraging “AI-as-a-Service”," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 937-960, November.
    4. Schilke, Oliver & Reimann, Martin, 2025. "The transparency dilemma: How AI disclosure erodes trust," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene, 2025. "Connecting land tenure to climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    7. Zeddies, Hendrik Hilmar & Parlasca, Martin & Qaim, Matin, 2025. "Agrivoltaics increases public acceptance of solar energy production on agricultural land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    8. Ho, Peter & Zevenbergen, Jaap & Tan, Rong, 2024. "The Credibility Thesis, a decade onwards: A review of the theoretical field, findings and future," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene, 2019. "Anatomy of women’s landlessness in the patrilineal customary land tenure systems of sub-Saharan Africa and a policy pathway," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 126-135.
    10. Anil R. Doshi & J. Jason Bell & Emil Mirzayev & Bart S. Vanneste, 2025. "Generative artificial intelligence and evaluating strategic decisions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 583-610, March.
    11. Simón, Cristina & Revilla, Elena & Jesús Sáenz, Maria, 2024. "Integrating AI in organizations for value creation through Human-AI teaming: A dynamic-capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    12. Villavicencio-Pinto, Eduardo, 2025. "The geography of property rights: Land concentration, irrigation access and rural poverty under climate change in Chile," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Riikka M. Sarala & Corinne Post & Jonathan Doh & Daniel Muzio, 2025. "Advancing Research on the Future of Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (AI)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(5), pages 1863-1884, July.
    14. Xing, Zeyu & Yalçin, Haydar & Daim, Tugrul, 2024. "Digital Economy's influence on R&D Network configurations: Integrating resource dependence theory and institutional theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Mike W Peng & Denis Y L Wang & Yi Jiang, 2008. "An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 39(5), pages 920-936, July.
    16. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    17. Sarv Devaraj & Rajiv Kohli, 2003. "Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 273-289, March.
    18. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    19. Michael J. Tippins & Ravipreet S. Sohi, 2003. "IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 745-761, August.
    20. Muhammad Yorga Permana, 2025. "Working remotely in the city? Regional embeddedness of online platform workers in Indonesia’s secondary cities," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2506603-250, December.
    21. Jee Young Chung & Bruce K. Berger & Jamie DeCoster, 2016. "Developing Measurement Scales of Organizational and Issue Legitimacy: A Case of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 405-413, August.
    22. Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene & Paradza, Gaynor & Nghitevelekwa, Romie Vonkie & Klaus, Michael, 2024. "Current research and opinion on land governance for societal development in and on the global south," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    23. Christiaan Röell & Felix Arndt & Vikas Kumar, 2024. "A Blessing and a Curse: Institutional Embeddedness of Longstanding MNE Subsidiaries in Emerging Markets," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 561-594, March.
    24. Cao, Yu & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Are they satisfied with land taking? Aspects on procedural fairness, monetary compensation and behavioral simulation in China’s land expropriation story," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 166-178.
    25. An, Meng & Lin, Jiabao & Luo, Xin (Robert), 2024. "The impact of human AI skills on organizational innovation: The moderating role of digital organizational culture," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    26. Herkes, Feie J. & Zouridis, Stavros, 2023. "The legitimacy of land use decisions by public authorities in the Netherlands: Results from a survey experiment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nam, Dalwoo & Lee, Junyeong & Lee, Heeseok, 2019. "Business analytics use in CRM: A nomological net from IT competence to CRM performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 233-245.
    2. Mamakou, Xenia J., 2026. "Linking business analytics to firm performance: A mixed-method analysis of capabilities, decision quality, and firm size," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Khalid Mehmood & Nisbat Ali & Muhammad Usman & Aamir Suhail & Kehkashan Siddiqui, 2026. "Empowering sustainable entrepreneurship through data-driven innovation: A pathway to ESG performance in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Theodosiou, Marios & Katsikea, Evangelia & Alarape, Oluyomi & Rethore, Christophe & Makri, Katerina, 2026. "Enhancing agility and international performance through learning processes and digitalization capabilities in Nigerian SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    5. Sarianna M. Lundan & Jiatao Li, 2019. "Adjusting to and learning from institutional diversity: Toward a capability-building perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(1), pages 36-47, February.
    6. Jingmei Gao & Zahid Sarwar, 2024. "How do firms create business value and dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics management capability?," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 283-304, September.
    7. Betty Feng, Jing & Liu, Steven Y.H. & Anne Liu, Leigh, 2023. "Cognitive antecedents of EMNEs’ dynamic capabilities: A case study of global identity at Lenovo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Ayden, Yuksel & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Glaister, Keith W. & Demirbag, Mehmet, 2021. "Exploring the internationalization strategies of Turkish multinationals: A multi-perspective analysis," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3).
    9. Phong Nguyen, Nguyen & Adomako, Samuel & Ahsan, Mujtaba, 2023. "The base-of- the-pyramid orientation and export performance of Vietnamese small and medium enterprises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Bianchi, Constanza & Mathews, Shane, 2016. "Internet marketing and export market growth in Chile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 426-434.
    11. Xuecheng Yang & Yunfei Shao, 2026. "Navigating the evolution of innovation: the dynamic synergy of search behaviors and alliance portfolio configurations," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 192-238, April.
    12. Baker, William E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Gattermann Perin, Marcelo, 2022. "Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 863-873.
    13. Zhou, H. & Uhlaner, L.M., 2009. "Knowledge Management as a Strategic Tool to Foster Innovativeness of SMEs," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-025-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Shumei Han & Di Zhang & Hongfeng Zhang & Shuaijun Lin, 2025. "Artificial Intelligence Technology, Organizational Learning Capability, and Corporate Innovation Performance: Evidence from Chinese Specialized, Refined, Unique, and Innovative Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    15. Marjorie Lecerf & Nessrine Omrani, 2020. "SME Internationalization: the Impact of Information Technology and Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 11(2), pages 805-824, June.
    16. Roh, Taewoo & Xiao, Shufeng (Simon) & Park, Byung Il, 2024. "MNEs' capabilities and their sustainable business in emerging markets: Evidence from MNE subsidiaries in China," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    17. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2023. "Understanding the Relationship between Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Sustainable Performance: The Role of Strategic Agility and Firm Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Liang, Yanze & Giroud, Axèle & Rygh, Asmund & Chen, Zibang, 2025. "Political embeddedness and post-acquisition innovation in MNEs: The role of experiential learning," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(6).
    19. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2010. "The “Third Hand”: IT-Enabled Competitive Advantage in Turbulence Through Improvisational Capabilities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 443-471, September.
    20. Tseng, Chiung-Hui & Lee, Ruby P., 2010. "Host environmental uncertainty and equity-based entry mode dilemma: The role of market linking capability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 407-418, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.