Author
Listed:
- Shen, Xiangdong
- Huang, Mingli
- Chen, Xin
- Liu, Zhuo
- Sun, Yue
- Ren, Weiwei
Abstract
The use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and mulch in traditional agricultural production has caused severe environmental pollution on cultivated land. The practice has proven different between farmer behaviors and perceptions regarding the low-carbon use of cultivated land, but research to bridge the gap remains insufficient. This study first constructed a “rigidity–elasticity–toughness” mechanism of environmental regulation. We then explored the influence of environmental regulation on farm households’ perceptions of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land and behavior on the basis of environmental regulation theory and the DPSIR model with a sample of 868 farm households in Jiangsu, China. The research results show that the three dimensions of environmental regulation trigger farmers’ positive understanding of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land; farmers’ understanding of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land has a significant positive effect on their low-carbon utilization behavior of cultivated land; and in regard to the relationship between farmers’ perceived benefits, the external natural environment and low-carbon behavior, there is a threshold for the moderating effect of farmers’ differentiation type. This study provides insights for agricultural policy-makers to formulate relevant guidance strategies from a regulatory perspective to promote low-carbon utilization of farmers’ cultivated land and low-carbon green development in the agricultural sector.
Suggested Citation
Shen, Xiangdong & Huang, Mingli & Chen, Xin & Liu, Zhuo & Sun, Yue & Ren, Weiwei, 2026.
"Rigidity-elasticity-toughness mechanism for low-carbon utilization of environmentally-regulated cultivated land in Jiangsu, China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001365
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108052
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.