IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001365.html

Rigidity-elasticity-toughness mechanism for low-carbon utilization of environmentally-regulated cultivated land in Jiangsu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Xiangdong
  • Huang, Mingli
  • Chen, Xin
  • Liu, Zhuo
  • Sun, Yue
  • Ren, Weiwei

Abstract

The use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and mulch in traditional agricultural production has caused severe environmental pollution on cultivated land. The practice has proven different between farmer behaviors and perceptions regarding the low-carbon use of cultivated land, but research to bridge the gap remains insufficient. This study first constructed a “rigidity–elasticity–toughness” mechanism of environmental regulation. We then explored the influence of environmental regulation on farm households’ perceptions of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land and behavior on the basis of environmental regulation theory and the DPSIR model with a sample of 868 farm households in Jiangsu, China. The research results show that the three dimensions of environmental regulation trigger farmers’ positive understanding of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land; farmers’ understanding of low-carbon utilization of cultivated land has a significant positive effect on their low-carbon utilization behavior of cultivated land; and in regard to the relationship between farmers’ perceived benefits, the external natural environment and low-carbon behavior, there is a threshold for the moderating effect of farmers’ differentiation type. This study provides insights for agricultural policy-makers to formulate relevant guidance strategies from a regulatory perspective to promote low-carbon utilization of farmers’ cultivated land and low-carbon green development in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Xiangdong & Huang, Mingli & Chen, Xin & Liu, Zhuo & Sun, Yue & Ren, Weiwei, 2026. "Rigidity-elasticity-toughness mechanism for low-carbon utilization of environmentally-regulated cultivated land in Jiangsu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001365
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001365
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saakjans, Daniels & Kaufmann, David & Hersperger, Anna M., 2026. "Scrutinising European land-use planning: Identifying the priorities and goals of building regulations," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Krieger, Bastian & Rainville, Anne, 2026. "The effects of public procurement requirements and voluntary standards on environmental product innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(3).
    3. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2020. "The impact of alternative policies on livestock farmers' willingness to recycle manure: evidence from central China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 583-594, June.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Yan, Zheming & Yu, Ying & Du, Kerui & Zhang, Ning, 2024. "How does environmental regulation promote green technology innovation? Evidence from China's total emission control policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    6. Thomas Talhelm & Xiawei Dong, 2024. "People quasi-randomly assigned to farm rice are more collectivistic than people assigned to farm wheat," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Chigbu, Uchendu Eugene, 2025. "Connecting land tenure to climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    8. Etongo, Daniel & Labrosse, Jean-Claude & Serret, Larrisha & Sinon, Sandra, 2026. "Using the theory of planned behavior to assess Seychellois farmers’ intentions to adopt agroforestry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    9. Xilu Qiu & Xinyi Jin & Shuiling Huang & Henglang Xie & Wei Zhao, 2025. "Market-incentive environmental regulation and total factor energy efficiency: evidence from China’s energy-consuming right trading pilot," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Ricarda Winkelmann & Julius Garbe & Jonathan F. Donges & Torsten Albrecht, 2026. "Mapping tipping risks from Antarctic ice basins under global warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 16(3), pages 341-349, March.
    11. Xia, Yuhuan & Liu, Mingyue & Zhang, Wenjia & Liu, Yi, 2026. "Do innovation requirements always boost innovation? The moderating influence of creative Self-Efficacy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    12. Theresa Eichhorn & Jochen Kantelhardt & Lena Luise Schaller, 2026. "Understanding farmers’ intention to perform result-based agri-environmental schemes for the improved provision of biodiversity and soil quality," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(1), pages 284-308, January.
    13. Shan, Biaoan & Nisar, Qasim Ali & Ali, Imran, 2026. "Leveraging blockchain technology and process innovation for green supply chain performance in environmentally sensitive industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    14. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Michael Klaus & Wenjun Zhang & Laina Alexander, 2023. "Rural Land Management and Revitalization through a Locally Coordinated Integrated Master Plan—A Model from Germany to China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Xie, Xiaohuan & Cai, Senhong & Deng, Haifeng & Li, Shengyuan & Liu, Xin & Gou, Zhonghua, 2026. "Optimizing county-level land use for sustainable photovoltaic development in China: A multi-scenario analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. J. Taylor & Irma Adelman, 2003. "Agricultural Household Models: Genesis, Evolution, and Extensions," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 33-58, January.
    17. Wang, Yiwei & Bai, Yuping & Wang, Jie & Deng, Xiangzheng & Hu, Yecui & Chen, Xin, 2026. "Rethinking workable solutions for saving cultivated land use and enhancing climate adaptation through diet shifts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Huber, Robert & Bartkowski, Bartosz & Brown, Calum & El Benni, Nadja & Feil, Jan-Henning & Grohmann, Pascal & Joormann, Ineke & Leonhardt, Heidi & Mitter, Hermine & Müller, Birgit, 2024. "Farm typologies for understanding farm systems and improving agricultural policy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Li, Xing & Aghazadeh, Sahar & Liaquat, Malka & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Sunday Eweade, Babatunde, 2025. "Transforming Costa Rica's environmental quality: The role of renewable energy, rule of law, corruption control, and foreign direct investment in building a sustainable future," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    20. Xiao Lei & Lin Zhou & Wentao Hu, 2026. "Environmental Regulation, Respiratory Diseases, and Medical Costs," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 34(1), pages 198-223, January.
    21. Kai Tang & Chunbo Ma & Wenhua Zhou & Mingzhe Wang, 2026. "Environmental regulation and enterprise behavior in China: rent-seeking or innovation?," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(2), pages 425-455, January.
    22. Jia, Jia & Zhang, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Wenzhong, 2025. "Between place attachment and urban planning in Jinan: Does environmental quality affect human perception in a developing country context?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    23. Wang, Qian & Wang, Yanan & Chen, Wei & Zhou, Xue & Zhao, Minjuan & Zhang, Bangbang, 2020. "Do land price variation and environmental regulation improve chemical industrial agglomeration? A regional analysis in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    24. Alblas, Edwin & van Zeben, Josephine, 2023. "Public participation for a greener Europe: The potential of farmers in biodiversity monitoring," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    25. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2020. "The impact of alternative policies on livestock farmers' willingness to recycle manure: evidence from central China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 583-594, June.
    26. Wynne W. Chin & Abhijit Gopal & W. David Salisbury, 1997. "Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 342-367, December.
    27. Dumortier, Jerome & Elobeid, Amani, 2021. "Effects of a carbon tax in the United States on agricultural markets and carbon emissions from land-use change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    28. Shiwei Ng & Olaf Hinrichsen & S. Viswanathan, 2026. "Contextual conditions define maximum energy-use threshold in low-carbon controlled environment agriculture for agri-food transformation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    29. Canessa, Carolin & Ait-Sidhoum, Amer & Wunder, Sven & Sauer, Johannes, 2024. "What matters most in determining European farmers’ participation in agri-environmental measures? A systematic review of the quantitative literature," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang Vu, Hoai Nam & Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt, 2022. "Understanding determinants of the intention to buy rhino horn in Vietnam through the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Obuobi, Bright & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Citizens' willingness to pay for local anaerobic digestion energy: The influence of altruistic value and knowledge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    3. Rajib Roy & Fatima Akhtar & Niladri Das, 2017. "Entrepreneurial intention among science & technology students in India: extending the theory of planned behavior," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1013-1041, December.
    4. Hsiao-Ping Chang & Chun-Chieh Ma & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Climate Change and Consumer’s Attitude toward Insect Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Yadav, Rambalak & Pathak, Govind S., 2017. "Determinants of Consumers' Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 114-122.
    6. Chuanhui Liao & Hui Li, 2019. "Environmental Education, Knowledge, and High School Students’ Intention toward Separation of Solid Waste on Campus," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Jin, Jie & Ren, Xinyue & Xi, Xunzhuo & Zhao, Qiuhong, 2025. "Carrot or stick? How to effectively manage non-scale farming waste in rural areas," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Chung-Te Ting & Chi-Ming Hsieh & Hsiao-Ping Chang & Han-Shen Chen, 2019. "Environmental Consciousness and Green Customer Behavior: The Moderating Roles of Incentive Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Determinants of adoption intention of battery swap technology for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    10. Xi Chen & Chunlan Jiao & Ran Ji & Yu Li, 2021. "Examining Customer Motivation and Its Impact on Customer Engagement Behavior in Social Media: The Mediating Effect of Brand Experience," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    11. Lulu Tou & Jianhua Wang & May Chu, 2024. "From intention to action: Enabling sustainable agriculture in emerging economies through decentralized regulations for manure management," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(5), pages 445-459, December.
    12. Dongliang Zhang & Guangqing Huang & Xiaoling Yin & Qinghua Gong, 2015. "Residents’ Waste Separation Behaviors at the Source: Using SEM with the Theory of Planned Behavior in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, August.
    13. Zhu, Laqiqige & O’Hagan-Luff, Martha, 2026. "Applying real options theory to farmers’ afforestation decisions in Ireland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    14. Akkhaporn Kokkhangplu & Wanida Onlamai & Tananat Chokpreedapanich & Kraisak Phikul, 2023. "What Predicts Behavioral Intention in Eco-Friendly Hotels? The Roles of Tourist’s Perceived Value and Satisfaction: A Case Study of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    15. Bairong Wang & Yong Li, 2022. "Consumers’ Intention to Bring a Reusable Bag for Shopping in China: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. Wei, Haoran & Liu, Yulin, 2025. "The impact of climate risk on rural land transfer:Evidence from 360 Chinese villages," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Abhay Vyas & Gyaneshwar singh Kushwaha & Nenavath Sreenu, 2025. "Eco-Friendly or Eco-Fraud? The role of green washing in consumer behavior," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(11), pages 1-30, November.
    18. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & James Agarwal, 2004. "Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 336-355, December.
    19. Sara Kanwal & Sauda Salim Hamdun Al Marhoobi & Saad Mahmood Bhatti & Asma-Qamaliah Abdul-Hamid & Norhidayah Suleiman & Mohd Helmi Ali, 2025. "Modeling the intention to accept 3D-printed foods: the role of religious beliefs, food neophobia and food technology neophobia," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Xi Chen & Xiangdong Shen & Xiangmeng Huang & Yu Li, 2021. "Research on Social Media Content Marketing: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s 10 Metropolis for Korean Brands," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.