IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001237.html

Understanding city dynamics by analyzing investment processes - an integrated formal and semantic approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kaczmarek, Iwona
  • Iwaniak, Adam

Abstract

Understanding investment-construction processes and their dynamics is crucial for effective urban planning, but these processes are often complex and fragmented. While advances in GeoAI offer powerful new tools for analysis, conventional approaches to studying urban development face two key limitations. First, they frequently neglect to represent the processual characteristics of development, regarding complex, multi-phase projects as a succession of isolated incidents. Second, the analysis of what is being built is usually limited to broad, formal categories that hide the differences between projects. This results in a methodological gap, distinguishing the analysis of project intentions (semantics) from their structure (quantitative attributes). To address these limitations, this study introduces and validates a novel GeoAI-driven methodology that uses building permit data as a high-resolution proxy to conduct an integrated analysis of investment-construction processes. By combining formal (quantitative) and semantic (textual) dimensions, our approach provides a comprehensive understanding of these dynamics, demonstrated through an extensive analysis of over 60 000 building permits issued in Wroclaw, Poland (2006–2023). The core methodology involves three primary contributions. First, after using graph analysis to aggregate individual permits into cohesive investment components, we introduce the Investment Complexity Index (ICI), a novel synthetic metric designed to quantify the diversity, scale, and duration of these processes. Second, we employ semantic clustering (using BERT) to analyze textual permit descriptions, creating a nuanced typology of what is being built. Third, we apply quantitative clustering (using AHC) to a comprehensive set of attributes to identify how these investments are structured in terms of their spatial, temporal, and sequential features. This study shows that the proposed integrated analytical approach, which combines quantitative, semantic, and synthetic measures of complexity, provides a much richer and more nuanced picture of investment processes than one-dimensional methods. This has important implications for urban research and planning practices and offers tools to better understand and manage the dynamics of urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaczmarek, Iwona & Iwaniak, Adam, 2026. "Understanding city dynamics by analyzing investment processes - an integrated formal and semantic approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001237
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:bs6wy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Han Li & Ye Hua Dennis Wei & Zhiji Huang, 2014. "Urban Land Expansion and Spatial Dynamics in Globalizing Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-20, December.
    3. kilani, bochra hadj, 2023. "K-Means Clustering algorithms in Urban studies: A Review of Unsupervised Machine Learning techniques," OSF Preprints bs6wy, Center for Open Science.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:fs76e_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Hans R.A. Koster & Jan Rouwendal, 2012. "The Impact Of Mixed Land Use On Residential Property Values," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 733-761, December.
    6. Lin, Yang & Thackway, William & Soundararaj, Balamurugan & Eagleson, Serryn & Han, Hoon & Pettit, Christopher, 2024. "Transforming Urban Planning through Machine Learning: A Study on Planning Application Classification using Natural Language Processing," OSF Preprints fs76e, Center for Open Science.
    7. Xingrui Zhang & Eunhwa Yang, 2023. "Observation of relationship between housing value and the number of building permits in the United States using time series method," International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 106-122, August.
    8. David Coble & Pablo Pincheira, 2021. "Forecasting building permits with Google Trends," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 3315-3345, December.
    9. Joseph Gyourko & Albert Saiz, 2006. "Construction Costs And The Supply Of Housing Structure," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 661-680, October.
    10. Massimo Cecchini & Ilaria Zambon & Luca Salvati, 2019. "Housing and the City: A Spatial Analysis of Residential Building Activity and the Socio-Demographic Background in a Mediterranean City, 1990–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    2. Edward L. Glaeser & Joseph Gyourko, 2006. "Housing Dynamics," NBER Working Papers 12787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Ramírez Sierra, Gabriel Darío & González Martínez, Alayn Alejandro & Monroy Cruz, Miguel Ángel & Zapata Barrientos, Luis Gerardo, 2024. "The impact of subsidies on house prices in Mexico's mortgage market for low-income households 2008–2019," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Oliver Lerbs, "undated". "House Prices, Housing Development Costs, and the Supply of New Single-Family Housing in German Counties and Cities," Working Papers 201283, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    5. Liu, Jixiang & Xiao, Longzhu, 2023. "Non-linear relationships between built environment and commuting duration of migrants and locals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. d'Aspremont, Alexandre & Ben Arous, Simon & Bricongne, Jean-Charles & Lietti, Benjamin & Meunier, Baptiste, 2025. "Satellites turn “concrete”: Tracking cement with satellite data and neural networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 249(PC).
    7. Chang-Deok Kang, 2019. "Effects of spatial access to neighborhood land-use density on housing prices: Evidence from a multilevel hedonic analysis in Seoul, South Korea," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(4), pages 603-625, May.
    8. Jörn‐Steffen Pischke, 2018. "Wage Flexibility and Employment Fluctuations: Evidence from the Housing Sector," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 85(339), pages 407-427, July.
    9. Pierre-Philippe Combes & Gilles Duranton & Laurent Gobillon, 2021. "The Production Function for Housing: Evidence from France," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(10), pages 2766-2816.
    10. Eric Smith & Zoe Xie & Lei Fang, 2026. "The Short and the Long of It: Stock‐Flow Matching in the US Housing Market," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 67(4), pages 1211-1243, October.
    11. Alan Duncan & Abebe Hailemariam, 2025. "Come and say G’day: Using search engine data to understand the dynamics of tourism demand in Australia," Tourism Economics, , vol. 31(7), pages 1428-1451, November.
    12. Peter Gordon & Wendell Cox, 2012. "Cities in Western Europe and the United States: do policy differences matter?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(2), pages 565-594, April.
    13. Eric Fesselmeyer & Haoming Liu & Louisa Poco, 2024. "Within‐development density and housing prices in Singapore," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(2), pages 406-427, March.
    14. Zhigao Liu & Jiayi Zhang & Oleg Golubchikov, 2019. "Edge-Urbanization: Land Policy, Development Zones, and Urban Expansion in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Sipei Pan & Jiale Liang & Wanxu Chen & Jiangfeng Li & Ziqi Liu, 2021. "Gray Forecast of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of China: A Case Study in Guizhou Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Oikarinen, Elias & Peltola, Risto & Valtonen, Eero, 2015. "Regional variation in the elasticity of supply of housing, and its determinants: The case of a small sparsely populated country," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 18-30.
    17. Paciorek, Andrew, 2013. "Supply constraints and housing market dynamics," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 11-26.
    18. Xindong Wei & Ning Wang & Pingping Luo & Jie Yang & Jian Zhang & Kangli Lin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Land Marketization and Its Driving Forces for Sustainable Urban–Rural Development in Shaanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Evert Meijers & Martijn Burger & Edward L. Glaeser & Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Yimei Zou, 2016. "Urban networks: Connecting markets, people, and ideas," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(1), pages 17-59, March.
    20. Yunes Almansoub & Ming Zhong & Asif Raza & Muhammad Safdar & Abdelghani Dahou & Mohammed A. A. Al-qaness, 2022. "Exploring the Effects of Transportation Supply on Mixed Land-Use at the Parcel Level," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.