Author
Listed:
- Karimi, Vahid
- Ahmadifard, Elham
- Singh, Gerald G.
- Keshavarz, Marzieh
- Karami, Ezatollah
- Azadi, Hossein
- Yazdanpanah, Masoud
Abstract
Community participation has emerged as a key mechanism for safeguarding ecosystems and improving livelihoods in protected areas. This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of the factors and research discourses shaping community participation in conservation initiatives through a systematic literature review guided by the PRISMA framework and aligned with the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence standards. A total of 85 articles were examined through bibliometric analysis and 63 studies were analyzed thematically. Bibliometric mapping identified four primary domains economic, social, managerial, and policy factors while thematic analysis expanded this structure into seven interrelated dimensions: economic, social, policy, environmental, managerial-administrative, individual-demographic, and knowledge-awareness factors. The findings show that social dimensions play the most prominent role in fostering participation, whereas policy-related factors exert comparatively limited influence. Economic factors demonstrated the strongest contribution to SDG advancement, particularly because communities living in and around protected areas are often economically vulnerable and highly dependent on natural resources. These findings suggest that effective participatory conservation requires stronger social capital, equitable economic incentives, and transparent governance mechanisms. The study offers practical insights for policymakers and protected-area managers seeking to design more inclusive, context-sensitive, and SDG-aligned conservation strategies.
Suggested Citation
Karimi, Vahid & Ahmadifard, Elham & Singh, Gerald G. & Keshavarz, Marzieh & Karami, Ezatollah & Azadi, Hossein & Yazdanpanah, Masoud, 2026.
"Community participation in protected-areas management: A systematic literature review based on the sustainable development goals,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001213
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108037
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.