Author
Listed:
- Chen, Xiaohong
- Cai, Sijia
- Qiang, Hongjie
- Chen, Jie
- Hu, Dongbin
- Geng, Yong
- Wang, Yangjie
Abstract
Effective management of protection areas (PAs) has long been a world-wide difficulty, especially for developing countries. National nature reserves, as the highest level of officially certified PAs in China, have been widely established for the purpose of strengthening ecological protection. In this study, we use the establishment of 471 national nature reserves (NNRs) as a quasi-natural experiment to evaluate their performance on anti-human disturbance based on the multi-period difference-in-difference model. We find that: (1) there is a significant threshold in the effects of upgrading administrative level for PAs: the establishment of national nature reserves has led to a significant decrease in nighttime light intensity, while other administrative level upgradation has little influence.; (2) effectiveness of PAs differs across geographic areas and management situations. Our findings suggest that (1) providing sufficient authority for PAs in to operate independently from grassroot governments is of great necessity; (2) clarifying government responsibilities, increasing resources investment, and strengthening supervision are key to improve effectiveness of PAs; (3) allowing regulations to vary in stringency over space may provide greater environmental benefits. These empirical findings provide evidence that establishing national PAs is critical for addressing conservation gaps and enhancing conservation effectiveness.
Suggested Citation
Chen, Xiaohong & Cai, Sijia & Qiang, Hongjie & Chen, Jie & Hu, Dongbin & Geng, Yong & Wang, Yangjie, 2026.
"Institution authority and the protection efficacy of nature reserves: Evidence from China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001195
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108035
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.