IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v167y2026ics0264837726001171.html

Before the ground breaks: Is inclusionary zoning a shield or a signal of gentrification?

Author

Listed:
  • Freeman, Lance
  • Lei, Yining
  • Maaoui, Magda

Abstract

Inclusionary Zoning (IZ) is a tool in land use planning for leveraging new market-rate housing to produce affordable housing, typically in exchange for increased density. While growing in popularity, IZ receives criticisms for the possibility that its market-rate housing component would lead to gentrification by altering local housing markets. Using New York City’s Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) program, a relatively ambitious IZ effort, we test if IZ increases home sales prices and rents in areas that are designated as MIH zones. Based on a comparison of MIH zones to surrounding “control” areas, we find evidence of MIH increased both home sales prices and rents, but the most consistent and statistically significant growth occurred in areas immediately surrounding MIH zones. We find little evidence of price escalation in MIH zones. Our findings suggest that for IZs that are geographically limited like MIH, the costs to residents such as gentrification and increased housing prices may be externalized onto nearby neighborhoods. This points to a policy need for more spatially integrated planning approaches to affordable housing, where affordability protections extend beyond narrowly drawn IZ boundaries.

Suggested Citation

  • Freeman, Lance & Lei, Yining & Maaoui, Magda, 2026. "Before the ground breaks: Is inclusionary zoning a shield or a signal of gentrification?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001171
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726001171
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:167:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726001171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.