Author
Listed:
- Zhao, Qiqi
- Chen, Dengshuai
- Wan, Sida
- Chen, Yanming
- Li, Manchun
- Thierry, Hugo
- Sherren, Kate
Abstract
Demand for urban development and the exploration of sustainable development pathways cause increasing challenges in land use change management. Cultural ecosystem services play an important role in the maintenance and optimization of the urban system, and are non-substitutable. Research into the integration of land use change and the response of cultural ecosystem services can help to ensure socio-economic and human well-being in the context of government intervention. We leverage a social survey, land use maps, government statistics and environmental driving data, and construct an integrated research framework through geospatial model, system dynamics and land use simulation model to predict land use changes in Nanjing under different future development scenarios and simulate the influence of multiple land use scenarios on the supply of cultural services. The results demonstrate that under the ecological protection scenario (EOP), all cultural services were maximized, and under the coordinated development scenario (COD), the needs of the economy and cultural services are more balanced, under the economic priority scenario (ECP), biodiversity and recreation services are at risk of erosion. Tourism and development, aesthetic and historical services show a tendency to improve with economic development, but biodiversity and recreation services that rely more on the natural environment may be negatively affected. To maintain social, economic and ecological well-being in Nanjing our scenarios may need to be hybridized. For instance, administrative districts already considered to have strong economic development could apply the EOP, while others can apply the COD.
Suggested Citation
Zhao, Qiqi & Chen, Dengshuai & Wan, Sida & Chen, Yanming & Li, Manchun & Thierry, Hugo & Sherren, Kate, 2026.
"Exploring the influence of future land use changes on the cultural ecosystem services in a fast-developing region,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000943
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108010
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.