IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v166y2026ics0264837726000451.html

Hybrid land governance and customary tenure: Coexistence of communitarian and contractarian practices in Naraiyawa Village, Fiji

Author

Listed:
  • Wainiqolo, Doni
  • Varo, Joeli
  • Race, Digby

Abstract

This paper examines how communitarian and contractarian principles coexist in land governance within Naraiyawa village, Namosi Province, Fiji. Drawing on a mixed-methods approach, combining geospatial mapping of 1387 acres of Mataqali Nayalasa land with interviews from 37 farming households, the study explores how the customary practice of solesolevaki (collective labour) underpins a hybrid model that reconciles collective tenure with market-oriented farming. Results show that 92 % of households engage in both communal land management and private crop production. Despite deeper integration with market economies and digital tools, customary tenure remains secure, with no reported disputes or fears of dispossession. Land-use decisions are primarily driven by climate variability and market demand, but are mediated through culturally embedded systems that emphasise cooperation, equity, and resilience. The case challenges the assumption that customary and individualised governance are incompatible, showing how tradition can evolve to meet contemporary challenges without losing core values. Naraiyawa provides a compelling example of adaptive, community-led governance that integrates traditional ethics with national planning frameworks and the SDGs. The findings offer insights for policymakers seeking culturally grounded and climate-resilient land use strategies in the Pacific Islands and other customary tenure contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Wainiqolo, Doni & Varo, Joeli & Race, Digby, 2026. "Hybrid land governance and customary tenure: Coexistence of communitarian and contractarian practices in Naraiyawa Village, Fiji," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000451
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000451
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.