Author
Listed:
- Riley, Mark
- McConnachie, Stephen
- Pearson, Maddy
- Brockett, Beth
- Spencer, Katy
Abstract
UK and European land-use policy increasingly promotes tree cover expansion on farmland, yet existing research has focused mainly on structural barriers rather than farmers’ motivations and socio-cultural values. This paper addresses this gap by applying the Bourdieusian concept of the ‘good farmer’ and drawing on in-depth ‘farmer journey’ interviews with farmers who have expanded tree cover. It examines how historical experiences shape decisions and how skills and capitals associated with good farmer status may initially conflict with, but can gradually align with, tree-related practices. The findings challenge assumptions that trees are antithetical to good farming and indicate potential shifts in the farming ‘field’ and its ‘rules of the game.’ The paper also highlights that effective policy could look beyond structural barriers and engage with farmers’ identities, reframing trees as an expression of skill and recognising the work involved in establishing and managing them, while supporting approaches that integrate trees alongside productive farming. More broadly, the paper advances the good farmer literature by demonstrating how symbols of good farming are context-specific and evolve within changing agri-environmental conditions, showing how existing markers of good farming can coexist with—and potentially be strengthened by—those linked to tree cover expansion.
Suggested Citation
Riley, Mark & McConnachie, Stephen & Pearson, Maddy & Brockett, Beth & Spencer, Katy, 2026.
"Seeing the good for the trees: Tree cover expansion and the notion of the ‘good farmer’,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000062
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107922
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.