IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v166y2026ics0264837726000062.html

Seeing the good for the trees: Tree cover expansion and the notion of the ‘good farmer’

Author

Listed:
  • Riley, Mark
  • McConnachie, Stephen
  • Pearson, Maddy
  • Brockett, Beth
  • Spencer, Katy

Abstract

UK and European land-use policy increasingly promotes tree cover expansion on farmland, yet existing research has focused mainly on structural barriers rather than farmers’ motivations and socio-cultural values. This paper addresses this gap by applying the Bourdieusian concept of the ‘good farmer’ and drawing on in-depth ‘farmer journey’ interviews with farmers who have expanded tree cover. It examines how historical experiences shape decisions and how skills and capitals associated with good farmer status may initially conflict with, but can gradually align with, tree-related practices. The findings challenge assumptions that trees are antithetical to good farming and indicate potential shifts in the farming ‘field’ and its ‘rules of the game.’ The paper also highlights that effective policy could look beyond structural barriers and engage with farmers’ identities, reframing trees as an expression of skill and recognising the work involved in establishing and managing them, while supporting approaches that integrate trees alongside productive farming. More broadly, the paper advances the good farmer literature by demonstrating how symbols of good farming are context-specific and evolve within changing agri-environmental conditions, showing how existing markers of good farming can coexist with—and potentially be strengthened by—those linked to tree cover expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Riley, Mark & McConnachie, Stephen & Pearson, Maddy & Brockett, Beth & Spencer, Katy, 2026. "Seeing the good for the trees: Tree cover expansion and the notion of the ‘good farmer’," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000062
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000062
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fischer, Joern & Abson, David J. & Butsic, Van & Chappell, M. Jahi & Ekroos, Johan & Hanspach, Jan & Kuemmerle, Tobias & Smith, Henrik G. & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2014. "Land sparing versus land sharing: Moving forward," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 149-157.
    2. Hopkins, Jonathan & Sutherland, Lee-Ann & Ehlers, Melf-Hinrich & Matthews, Keith & Barnes, Andrew & Toma, Luiza, 2017. "Scottish farmers' intentions to afforest land in the context of farm diversification," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 122-132.
    3. Tim Lloyd & Charles Watkins & Daniel Williams, 1995. "Turning Farmers Into Foresters Via Market Liberalisation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 361-370, September.
    4. Westaway, Sally & Grange, Ian & Smith, Jo & Smith, Laurence G., 2023. "Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero: A review of lessons learnt from 100 years of land use policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Valatin, Gregory & Moseley, Darren & Dandy, Norman, 2016. "Insights from behavioural economics for forest economics and environmental policy: Potential nudges to encourage woodland creation for climate change mitigation and adaptation?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-36.
    6. Kaine, Geoff & Edwards, Peter & Polyakov, Maksym & Stahlmann-Brown, Philip, 2023. "Who knew afforestation was such a challenge? Motivations and impediments to afforestation policy in New Zealand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    7. Vidyaratne, Herath & Vij, Akshay & Regan, Courtney M., 2020. "A socio-economic exploration of landholder motivations to participate in afforestation programs in the Republic of Ireland: The role of irreversibility, inheritance and bequest value," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Jean McGuire & Lois Morton & Alicia Cast, 2013. "Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 30(1), pages 57-69, March.
    9. George Cusworth & Jennifer Dodsworth, 2021. "Using the ‘good farmer’ concept to explore agricultural attitudes to the provision of public goods. A case study of participants in an English agri-environment scheme," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 929-941, December.
    10. Rob Burton, 2012. "Understanding Farmers' Aesthetic Preference for Tidy Agricultural Landscapes: A Bourdieusian Perspective," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 51-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Pronti & S. Mancinelli & M. Mazzanti & L. Crudeli, 2025. "The ‘Good Farmer’ concept and the diffusion of innovations in rural Africa," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 42(1), pages 191-222, April.
    2. Rafiee, Zohreh & Breen, James & Kilcline, Kevin & Mohammadrezaei, Mohammad, 2025. "Factors affecting farmers' intentions to adopt of small-scale afforestation measures in Ireland: An application of the theory of planned behaviour," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Avery Lavoie & Chloe B. Wardropper, 2021. "Engagement with conservation tillage shaped by “good farmer” identity," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 975-985, December.
    4. Sonia Lequin & Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2019. "Harnessing the power of identity to encourage farmers to protect the environment," Post-Print hal-01999647, HAL.
    5. Felton, Michelle & Jones, Philip & Tranter, Richard & Clark, Joanna & Quaife, Tristan & Lukac, Martin, 2023. "Farmers’ attitudes towards, and intentions to adopt, agroforestry on farms in lowland South-East and East England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Rafiee, Zohreh & Breen, James & Kilcline, Kevin & Mohammadrezaei, Mohammad, 2026. "What motivates Irish farmers to participate in new afforestation schemes: Financial or environmental drivers?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. S. Walton & J. M. Lord & A. J. Lord & V. Kahui, 2024. "Conflicts between being a “Good Farmer” and freshwater policy: A New Zealand case study," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(1), pages 387-392, March.
    8. Barnes, A.P. & McMillan, J. & Sutherland, L.-A. & Hopkins, J. & Thomson, S.G., 2022. "Farmer intentional pathways for net zero carbon: Exploring the lock-in effects of forestry and renewables," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    9. Benjamin T. Phalan, 2018. "What Have We Learned from the Land Sparing-sharing Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Pierre Gasselin & Denis Sautier, 2021. "Introduction de la partie I. La spécialisation productive et territoriale : facteur de blocage ou de ressource ?," Post-Print hal-05177112, HAL.
    11. Ouellet, F. & Mundler, P. & Dupras, J. & Ruiz, J., 2020. "“Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Luca Mulazzani & Simone Piras & Claudia Giordano & Atsede Ghidey Alemayehu & Carla Barlagne & Ali Chebil & Chokri Thabet & Faten Khamassi & Johnny Mugisha & Josephine Kisakye & Evans Ligare Chimoita &, 2025. "Membership in farmers’ organizations and intention to innovate: A mixed random utility and behavioral approach," Post-Print hal-05294571, HAL.
    13. André Eduardo Biscaia Lacerda & Ana Lúcia Hanisch & Evelyn Roberta Nimmo, 2020. "Leveraging Traditional Agroforestry Practices to Support Sustainable and Agrobiodiverse Landscapes in Southern Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Ryan S. Naylor & Carter A. Hunt, 2021. "Tourism and Livelihood Sovereignty: A Theoretical Introduction and Research Agenda for Arctic Contexts," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-11, August.
    15. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. George Cusworth & Jennifer Dodsworth, 2021. "Using the ‘good farmer’ concept to explore agricultural attitudes to the provision of public goods. A case study of participants in an English agri-environment scheme," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(4), pages 929-941, December.
    17. Chapman, Mollie & Satterfield, Terre & Chan, Kai M.A., 2019. "When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 464-475.
    18. Jodie Asselin, 2022. "Plantation politics and discourse: Forests and property in upland Ireland," Economic Anthropology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), pages 336-348, June.
    19. Loconto, Allison & Desquilbet, Marion & Moreau, Théo & Couvet, Denis & Dorin, Bruno, 2020. "The land sparing – land sharing controversy: Tracing the politics of knowledge," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    20. Walters, Jeffrey P. & Negrete-Yankelevich, Simoneta & Gottschamer, Lawrence & la Mora, Alejandra Núñez-de & Lugo-Castilla, Sofía Lail & Cultid-Medina, Carlos & Ruiz-Ponce, Laura Pamela, 2026. "Exploring the synergies between food security and agrobiodiversity conservation for Milpa farming in Mexico: A systems approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:166:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.