IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v165y2026ics0264837726000670.html

The processes, patterns, and functional differentiation of land-use system evolution in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Guipeng
  • Long, Hualou

Abstract

Analyzing the evolution of China’s land-use system (LUS) provides a useful perspective for understanding the social transformation and guiding the territorial development and governance of China. This study adopts both theoretical analysis and quantitative empirical perspectives, focusing on the functions of the LUS. By utilizing methods such as evaluation index system, regional typology classification, and provincial functional concentration measurement, this study explores the multi-scale processes, patterns, functional differentiation, and the integration tendency of LUS evolution in China from 2000 to 2020. The following conclusions have been obtained: (1) Under the background of enhanced regional interactions, coupling, and “time-space compression”, the evolution of LUSs tends toward integration. The integration of multiple LUSs is a process of their differentiation, division of labor, and synergy, requiring functional elements to agglomerate at larger scales, achieving “upscaling functional differentiation”. (2) During 2000–2020, the urban development function, agricultural development function, and comprehensive development function of China’s LUS improved substantially, while the ecological development function experienced slight fluctuations. (3) The regional functions of internal components of China’s LUS are transitioning from being “homogeneous and weak” to being “specialized and strong”. The integration tendency in LUS evolution in China is strengthening, and the regional “upscaling functional differentiation” is progressing. (4) To the east of the “Hu Huanyong Line”, upscaling functional differentiation and overall integration of LUS functions are more likely to occur. To the west of the line, the development, integration, and upscaling functional differentiation of LUSs exhibit lagging progress, tending toward localized development at smaller scales and lower levels. (5) In relatively developed provinces, the functions of their LUSs were initially less concentrated but were becoming more concentrated. In less developed provinces, the functions of their LUSs were initially more concentrated but were becoming less concentrated. The centralization and decentralization of LUS functions may follow a spiral progression of “extensive expansion – internal densification – scale breakthrough”, with these two opposing tendencies alternating to continuously promote the functional enhancement, upscaling functional differentiation, division of labor restructuring, and overall evolutionary breakthrough of the LUS.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Guipeng & Long, Hualou, 2026. "The processes, patterns, and functional differentiation of land-use system evolution in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000670
    Download Restriction: Full text may be restricted for ScienceDirect subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107983?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Ma, Li & Long, Hualou & Tu, Shuangshuang & Zhang, Yingnan & Zheng, Yuhan, 2020. "Farmland transition in China and its policy implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Guo, Shan & Jiang, Li & Shen, Geoffrey Q.P., 2019. "Embodied pasture land use change in China 2000-2015: From the perspective of globalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 476-485.
    4. Zhou, Guipeng & Long, Hualou, 2025. "Explanation of land-use system evolution: Modes, trends, and mechanisms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Yanjun Meng & Kun Wang & Yuanyuan Lin, 2021. "The Role of Land Use Transition on Industrial Pollution Reduction in the Context of Innovation-Driven: The Case of 30 Provinces in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Diogo Duarte & Cidália Fonte & Hugo Costa & Mário Caetano, 2023. "Thematic Comparison between ESA WorldCover 2020 Land Cover Product and a National Land Use Land Cover Map," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2020. "Land use change and driving factors in rural China during the period 1995-2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Sadian, Ali & Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein, 2025. "The future of agricultural lands under the combined influence of shared socioeconomic pathways and urban expansion by 2050," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Wijesinghe, Dilnu Chanuwan & Sun, Pingjun & Liu, Zhigao, 2026. "Spatial evolution characteristics and driving factors of urban forms in the Colombo Metropolitan Area (CMA), Sri Lanka: A geo-informatics approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Qiaowen Lin & Lu Zhang & Bingkui Qiu & Yi Zhao & Chao Wei, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Land Use Patterns on Carbon Emissions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    11. Qianqian Chen & Ruifa Hu & Yiduo Sun & Chao Zhang, 2020. "How Does Rural–Urban Migration Experience Affect Arable Land Use? Evidence from 2293 Farmers in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Yuanzhi Guo & Jieyong Wang, 2023. "Land Consolidation in Rural China: Historical Stages, Typical Modes, and Improvement Paths," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Chen, Xin & Yu, Le & Du, Zhenrong & Liu, Zhu & Qi, Yuan & Liu, Tao & Gong, Peng, 2022. "Toward sustainable land use in China: A perspective on China’s national land surveys," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Ji, Xi & Su, Pinyi & Liu, Yifang & Wu, Guowei & Wu, Xudong, 2023. "Mutual complementarity of arable land use in the Sino-Africa trade: Evidence from the global supply chain," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    15. Yanting Zheng & Sai Zhao & Jinyuan Huang & Aifeng Lv, 2021. "Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Pattern and Mechanism of Land Use Mixture: Evidence from China’s County Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Zijuan Zhu & Zengxiang Zhang & Xiaoli Zhao & Lijun Zuo & Xiao Wang, 2022. "Characteristics of Land Use Change in China before and after 2000," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianya Zhao & Fanhao Yang & Yanglan Zhang & Shu Wang, 2025. "Increase in Grain Production Potential of China Under 2030 Well-Facilitated Farmland Construction Goal," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-31, July.
    2. Guo, Shan & Kong, Weilong & Wan, Yaohua & Zeng, Xinyu & Wu, Xiaofang, 2025. "Accounting for consumption-based cultivated land use in China: A structural driver-pathway framework," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 508(C).
    3. Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021. "Reflections on China's food security and land use policy under rapid urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Sun, Xueqing & Xiang, Pengcheng & Cong, Kexin, 2023. "Research on early warning and control measures for arable land resource security," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    5. Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Hu, Shougeng & Xiao, Renbin & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2022. "Functional transition of cultivated ecosystems: Underlying mechanisms and policy implications in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Dang, Yuxuan & Zhao, Zhenting & Kong, Xiangbin & Lei, Ming & Liao, Yubo & Xie, Zhen & Song, Wei, 2023. "Discerning the process of cultivated land governance transition in China since the reform and opening-up-- Based on the multiple streams framework," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Shilin Li & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Non-Grain Production of Cultivated Land and Its Underlying Factors in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Yang, Hao & Zou, Runyan & Hu, Yueming & Wang, Lu & Xie, Yingkai & Tan, Zhengxi & Zhu, Zhiqiang & Zhu, A.-Xing & Gong, Jianzhou & Mao, Xiaoyun, 2024. "Sustainable utilization of cultivated land resources based on "element coupling-function synergy" analytical framework: A case study of Guangdong, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Zhou, Yang & Zhong, Zhen & Cheng, Guoqiang, 2023. "Cultivated land loss and construction land expansion in China: Evidence from national land surveys in 1996, 2009 and 2019," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    10. Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Xi Wu & Yajuan Wang & Hongbo Zhu, 2022. "Does Economic Growth Lead to an Increase in Cultivated Land Pressure? Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Qingping Lu & Siji Zhu & Zhaofu Xiao & Guifang Zhu & Jie Li & Jiahao Cui & Wen He & Jun Sun, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Variability and Drivers of Cropland Non-Agricultural Conversion Across Mountainous County Types: Evidence from the Qian-Gui Karst Region, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-26, April.
    13. Gang Liu & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Land Zoning Management to Achieve Carbon Neutrality: A Case Study of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Wang, Jieyong & Qu, Lulu & Li, Yurui & Feng, Weilun, 2023. "Identifying the structure of rural regional system and implications for rural revitalization: A case study of Yanchi County in northern China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    15. Wang, Pengfei & Li, Hongbo & Huang, Zhenbin, 2023. "The inter-provincial trade inequality in China: An assessment of the impact of changes in built-up land and carbon storage," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Weijia Chen & Yongquan Lu & Guilin Liu, 2022. "Balancing cropland gain and desert vegetation loss: The key to rural revitalization in Xinjiang, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1122-1145, September.
    17. Juan Li & Xunzhou Chunyu & Feng Huang, 2022. "Land Use Pattern Changes and the Driving Forces in the Shiyang River Basin from 2000 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    18. Zhaoyang Cai & Ge Song & Ruiqing Su & Yue Wang, 2025. "New insights to sustainable utilization of cultivated land: a synergistic path for coordinating competition of cultivated land utilization for crops based on multiple stakeholders," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(11), pages 28309-28332, November.
    19. Xinhui Feng & Yan Li & Lu Zhang & Chuyu Xia & Er Yu & Jiayu Yang, 2022. "Carbon Metabolism in Urban “Production–Living–Ecological” Space Based on Ecological Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, August.
    20. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.