Author
Abstract
Land-population relationship under flood risks in transboundary river basins is crucial for sustainable development and climate change-related natural disaster prevention, tightly linked to land use and land cover (LULC), yet the optimal land use policy remains unclear. This study takes the Lancang-Mekong River Basin (LMRB) as a typical case, employing optimization and Ecosystem Service Valuation (ESV) methods to analyze land-population relationship from 2001 to 2018 and explore potential policy implications. The results show that: (1) Post-flood LULC in LMRB faced an average ESV reduction of approximately 0.03 USD/person, with forest loss being the primary driver, contributing a total of 0.04 USD/person in ecosystem services. Impervious surfaces and tree/shrub cover cropland each resulted in an additional 0.04 USD/person ESV decline. (2) In the baseline scenario, total ESV in the LMRB increased by about 6 % compared to the original post-flood LULC, mainly driven by a 11.23 % expansion of swamp areas. Under different policy scenarios, the double-strict policy (70 % basic needs and 110 % highest needs) achieved a 9.28 % ESV increase, slightly higher than the baseline. Double-relaxed policy (90 % basic needs and 130 % highest needs) only led to a 3.24 % increase. Mixed policies, such as strict basic needs (70 %) combined with relaxed highest needs (130 %), yielded a 9.73 % ESV increase, while the relaxed basic needs (90 %) and strict highest needs (110 %) scenario also resulted in a 3.24 % increase. (3) Under high urbanization requirements, ESV increased by 4 % but cropland area decreased by 20 %. In contrast, high agricultural requirements caused a 1.81 % ESV decrease despite a 10 % increase in cropland, as forest and swamp experienced significant reductions. The forest expansion scenario showed a slight ESV increase but a 20 % decrease in grassland. This study provides valuable insights and guidance for post-flood LULC management, addressing the challenging land-population relationship in transboundary river basins.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600061x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.