Author
Listed:
- Liu, Jingyi
- Zhang, Menghan
- Xia, Yu
- Wu, Longfeng
- Chen, Chongxian
Abstract
For effective climate mitigation, land ecosystem conservation should focus on preserving carbon sinks instead of carbon stocks. However, the carbon sink capacity of land ecosystems is dynamic and uncertain, and its conservation is management-intensive and livelihood-impacting. This calls for more reliable evidence on future carbon sink dynamics and feasible policies for their conservation. This study evaluated spatial priorities for future carbon sink conservation in China by predicting carbon sink capacity from 2020 to 2100 using machine-learning models, while also mapping potential costs associated with management and population impacts. We found that intensified climate change may undermine future carbon sink capacity across extensive regions. Prioritised conservation areas were identified primarily in central, southern, and northeastern China, covering 8 %, 21.3 %, and 33.9 % of the country under conservative, moderate, and ambitious conservation targets, respectively. There is a modest synergy between priorities for carbon sink and biodiversity conservation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.515 and a spatial overlap of 9.9 %–42.6 % depending on conservation target levels. For actionable policies, we recommend focusing intensive management on just 12.6 % of China’s land, which aligns well with existing national ecological restoration projects. These findings provide evidence-based and feasible policies for carbon sink conservation in a resource-constrained country, with implications discussed for developing countries worldwide.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Jingyi & Zhang, Menghan & Xia, Yu & Wu, Longfeng & Chen, Chongxian, 2026.
"Carbon sink conservation: Cost-effective spatial priorities and feasible management policies for China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600058x
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107974
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:165:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600058x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.