Author
Abstract
Following the 1975 revolution, Ethiopia conducted a far-reaching land reform establishing a system of state ownership that remains to the present. This appears to justify the common narrative that subsequent governments have maintained the rural land tenure regime established by the revolution. However, this paper shows that rural tenure has changed significantly in the subsequent 50 years. After 1975 farmers held general rights to a share of community land, whereas subsequent reforms have established individual rights to particular plots. Incremental change culminated in a 2024 rural land proclamation that provides for rights of inheritance, rental and mortgage, all of which were prohibited in 1975. The process by which these changes came about also challenges the standard portrayal of Ethiopian federalism as a fiction to mask centralised domination: evolution took place through sub-national policy innovations and subsequent diffusion to the federal level. Theoretically, the paper engages with theories of property rights change. While acknowledging economic incentives and demography as contributing factors, it rejects simplistic ‘evolutionary’ theories of property rights. Instead, the paper emphasises the importance of a political economy approach, grounded in analysis of rulers’ strategies for maintaining power and their ideological commitments. Based on a process tracing methodology, which draws on key informant interviews and archival research conducted over 15 years, the paper shows that incremental change in land tenure reflects the shifting ideological commitments and survival strategies of an authoritarian regime, with periods of uncertainty and intra-elite divisions opening space for ideational transfer, sub-national experimentation and policy diffusion.
Suggested Citation
Lavers, Tom, 2026.
"Revolution and evolution in Ethiopian land tenure: Strategic interests and ideological shifts during 50 years of reform,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000633
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107979
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.