Author
Listed:
- Yang, Chendi
- Huang, Hao
- Meng, Sian
- Zhang, Yunjie
- Lo, Jacqueline T.Y.
- Ma, Rui
Abstract
Commercial vitality, or the ability of urban commercial facilities to attract and maintain human activity, is a key indicator of economic performance, urban vitality, and spatial equity. Current research focuses on commercial agglomeration areas, overlooking dispersed activities within heterogeneous urban forms. This study develops a typology-driven spatial framework for block commercial vitality (BCV) prediction through spatial feature engineering that integrates multi-source urban data with neighborhood catchment area (NCA). Shenzhen serves as the empirical setting, with real-time population flow data as a BCV proxy. Five categories of spatial features, demographic exposure, commercial gravity, small business intensity, transportation accessibility, and spatial configuration, were extracted to delineate the urban physical environment. Urban blocks were classified into nine morphological types by the Spacematrix method to place predictions in context. Three prediction models were compared, and the Random Forest regression performed best in predictive accuracy in empirical analysis. Feature importance analysis identified catering density, permanent population, and commercial gravity as the most influential predictors, while transportation and spatial configuration exert secondary influence. The framework indicates a stronger predictive performance for future-oriented block types compared to transitional mid-rise types. It provides methodological insights that are potentially transferable to other urban contexts to guide commercial planning, zoning optimization, and target renewal interventions at the block level.
Suggested Citation
Yang, Chendi & Huang, Hao & Meng, Sian & Zhang, Yunjie & Lo, Jacqueline T.Y. & Ma, Rui, 2026.
"Typology-based spatial modeling of urban block commercial vitality: Evidence from Shenzhen for land use planning,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000578
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107973
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.