IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics0264837726000566.html

A systematic comparison of urban and peri-urban vegetation greenness in 955 global major cities

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Qikang
  • Li, Zhe
  • Yuan, Chao

Abstract

Urbanization results in the conversion of vegetated land into impervious surfaces, substantially altering terrestrial ecosystems. To comprehensively assess these impacts, this study conducted a global comparative analysis of vegetation greenness between urban and peri-urban areas in 955 major cities from 2001 to 2019. Using satellite-derived Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data, this study examined both the absolute levels and temporal trends of vegetation greenness. The results showed that the ΔEVI and ΔNDVI (urban EVI or NDVI minus peri-urban EVI or NDVI) differed greatly by cities, and the method used to define urban and peri-urban areas. In most cities, the ΔEVI and ΔNDVI were negative, indicating lower vegetation greenness in urban cores. From 2001–2019, the average urban EVI and NDVI of these 955 cities decreased significantly (p < 0.01), while the average peri-urban EVI and NDVI increased significantly (p < 0.01), leading to a growing urban and peri-urban vegetation disparity. Furthermore, ΔEVI and ΔNDVI, along with their trends, generally decreased as the distance from the city increased, stabilizing when the distance exceeded 15 km. The presence of impervious surfaces and water bodies in peri-urban areas contributed to higher mean values and trend slopes of ΔEVI and ΔNDVI. The ΔEVI and ΔNDVI, along with their trends derived from high-resolution impervious surface data were generally lower than those from moderate-resolution land cover data. These findings contribute to our understanding of the impact of urbanization on vegetation greenness and provide a scientific foundation for urban planning and ecosystem management.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Qikang & Li, Zhe & Yuan, Chao, 2026. "A systematic comparison of urban and peri-urban vegetation greenness in 955 global major cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000566
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107972
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000566
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107972?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.