IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics0264837726000360.html

High-resolution carbon emission patterns in China driven by historical land use change from 1850 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao, Yuanyang
  • Meng, Jijun
  • Zhu, Likai
  • Han, Ziyan

Abstract

Accurate quantification of historical carbon emissions from land use changes is essential for assessing carbon sequestration potential and informing carbon neutrality goals. Existing research has significant limitations: studies with long time spans often lack spatial resolution, while those with high spatial resolution cover shorter time periods. To bridge this gap, this study developed a spatially explicit bookkeeping model at a 0.25° × 0.25° resolution, providing high-resolution estimates of carbon emissions from historical land use changes in China from 1850 to 2015. Our results reveal that the total net carbon emissions were 5.3 Pg C from 1850 to 2015. Reclamation (7.2 Pg C) and deforestation (1.6 Pg C) were the primary sources of carbon emissions, while cropland abandonment was the major driver of carbon sequestration (3.7 Pg C). China’s carbon sources were concentrated in three regions: (1) Northeast China and the Huang-Huai Plain (dominated by cropland reclamation); (2) the Sichuan Basin (cropland expansion); and (3) South China and Yunnan province (deforestation of subtropical forests). Significant carbon sinks are found in Northwest China, including the Hexi Corridor, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang. Precipitation was identified as the most influential driver for the spatial pattern of emissions, followed by topographic constraints and economic pressures. Our study underscores the role of the historical land use policies and social environments in influencing carbon emission. The LUC carbon emissions underwent a regime shift in 2012, transitioning from a source to a sink, which was attributable to the benefits of large-scale ecological projects. The research clarifies China’s role in global carbon budgets over long history and provides spatially explicit guidance for land management aligned with carbon neutrality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao, Yuanyang & Meng, Jijun & Zhu, Likai & Han, Ziyan, 2026. "High-resolution carbon emission patterns in China driven by historical land use change from 1850 to 2015," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000360
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000360
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frayer, Jens & Müller, Daniel & Sun, Zhanli & Munroe, Darla K. & Xu, Jianchu, 2014. "Processes Underlying 50 Years of Local Forest-Cover Change in Yunnan, China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(12), pages 3257-3273.
    2. Fan Yang & Fanneng He & Shicheng Li & Meijiao Li, 2019. "Exploring Spatiotemporal Pattern of Grassland Cover in Western China from 1661 to 1996," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael González-Val, 2021. "The Probability Distribution of Worldwide Forest Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Yin, Fang & Sun, Zhanli & You, Liangzhi & Müller, Daniel, 2018. "Increasing concentration of major crops in China from 1980 to 2011," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(5), pages 480-493.
    3. Piotr Krajewski, 2019. "Monitoring of Landscape Transformations within Landscape Parks in Poland in the 21st Century," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Lijuan Miao & Feng Zhu & Zhanli Sun & John C. Moore & Xuefeng Cui, 2016. "China’s Land-Use Changes during the Past 300 Years: A Historical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Yan, Ruhe & Zinda, John Aloysius & Ke, Shuifa, 2020. "Designating tree crops as forest: Land competition and livelihood effects mediate tree crops impact on natural forest cover in south China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    6. Piotr Krajewski & Iga Solecka & Karol Mrozik, 2018. "Forest Landscape Change and Preliminary Study on Its Driving Forces in Ślęża Landscape Park (Southwestern Poland) in 1883–2013," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Liu, Peng & Li, Wenwen & Yu, Yang & Tang, Ruchun & Guo, Xianming & Wang, Bin & Yang, Biao & Zhang, Li, 2019. "How much will cash forest encroachment in rainforests cost? A case from valuation to payment for ecosystem services in China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Zinda, John Aloysius & Zhang, Zhiming, 2019. "Explaining heterogeneous afforestation outcomes: How community officials and households mediate tree cover change in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 385-398.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.