IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics026483772600027x.html

Using the theory of planned behavior to assess Seychellois farmers’ intentions to adopt agroforestry

Author

Listed:
  • Etongo, Daniel
  • Labrosse, Jean-Claude
  • Serret, Larrisha
  • Sinon, Sandra

Abstract

Agroforestry is crucial in Africa for its ability to enhance food security, improve livelihoods, and promote sustainable land management by integrating trees into farmlands, thereby addressing climate change. Studies addressing the role of psychological factors in the adoption of agroforestry in Africa and island contexts are urgently needed. An extended Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was applied to assess its influence towards agroforestry adoption among farmers in Seychelles. A stratified random sampling was used to select 247 farmers across the five agricultural zones in Seychelles, and the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach, together with descriptive statistics, was applied in the analysis. The results indicate that knowledge improves the explanation of adoption and has a positive impact on farmers’ adoption of agroforestry. At the same time, the core TPB variables were found to be statistically insignificant. Regarding the four intention questions administered among the farmers, 67.2 % are willing to learn about agroforestry practices, 65.6 % are willing to receive information about agroforestry, and 60 % are eager to adopt agroforestry with financial support. In contrast, another 47.4 % are willing to adopt agroforestry without financial support. Despite these high levels of agreement, most TPB factors were insignificant predictors of the outcome. The lack of a significant influence of the TPB factors in our study suggests that we cannot confirm that TPB variables affect actual adoption and may support the common criticism of the model concerning the well-known intention-behaviour “gap”. We therefore recommend repeating this study in the next five years with the same farmers to address the intention-action gap. Lastly, studies on agroforestry adoption and retention are crucial, as some adopters may discontinue using the technology for various reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Etongo, Daniel & Labrosse, Jean-Claude & Serret, Larrisha & Sinon, Sandra, 2026. "Using the theory of planned behavior to assess Seychellois farmers’ intentions to adopt agroforestry," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600027x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772600027X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107943?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tingting Liu & Randall J. F. Bruins & Matthew T. Heberling, 2018. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Best Management Practices: A Review and Synthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Jha, Srijna & Kaechele, Harald & Sieber, Stefan, 2021. "Factors influencing the adoption of agroforestry by smallholder farmer households in Tanzania: Case studies from Morogoro and Dodoma," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    3. Peter Howley, 2015. "The Happy Farmer: The Effect of Nonpecuniary Benefits on Behavior," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(4), pages 1072-1086.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Edi Dwi Cahyono & Salsabila Fairuzzana & Deltanti Willianto & Eka Pradesti & Niall P. McNamara & Rebecca L. Rowe & Meine van Noordwijk, 2020. "Agroforestry Innovation through Planned Farmer Behavior: Trimming in Pine–Coffee Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Andrea Byfuglien & Valborg Kvakkestad & Stefania Innocenti, 2025. "Mitigation and adaptation in agriculture: effects of framing on farmers’ policy support and sustainable practices," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Ingram, Julie & Dwyer, Janet & Gaskell, Peter & Mills, Jane & Wolf, Pieter de, 2018. "Reconceptualising translation in agricultural innovation: A co-translation approach to bring research knowledge and practice closer together," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 38-51.
    8. Marija Ham & Marina Jeger & Anita Frajman Ivković, 2015. "The role of subjective norms in forming the intention to purchase green food," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 738-748, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oscar Montes de Oca Munguia & Rick Llewellyn, 2020. "The Adopters versus the Technology: Which Matters More when Predicting or Explaining Adoption?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 80-91, March.
    2. Noeldeke, Beatrice & Winter, Etti & Ntawuhiganayo, Elisée Bahati, 2022. "Representing human decision-making in agent-based simulation models: Agroforestry adoption in rural Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    3. Veronika Hannus & Johannes Sauer, 2021. "Understanding Farmers’ Intention to Use a Sustainability Standard: The Role of Economic Rewards, Knowledge, and Ease of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Daxini, Amar & Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Barnes, Andrew P., 2019. "Understanding farmers’ intentions to follow a nutrient management plan using the theory of planned behaviour," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 428-437.
    5. Dmytro Serebrennikov & Fiona Thorne & Zein Kallas & Sinéad N. McCarthy, 2020. "Factors Influencing Adoption of Sustainable Farming Practices in Europe: A Systemic Review of Empirical Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Hana Yousuf & Mostafa Al-Emran & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi & Khaled Shaalan, 2025. "Examining the factors influencing cybersecurity behaviors in m-payment contactless technologies using SEM–ANN approach," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(3), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Bourceret, Amélie & Amblard, Laurence & Mathias, Jean-Denis, 2023. "How do farmers’ environmental preferences influence the efficiency of information instruments for water quality management? Evidence from a social-ecological agent-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 478(C).
    8. Xiaohong Zhou & Donghong Ding, 2022. "Factors Influencing Farmers’ Willingness and Behaviors in Organic Agriculture Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on Survey Data of Farmers in Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Wood, Liza & Lubell, Mark & Rudnick, Jessica & Khalsa, Sat Darshan S. & Sears, Molly & Brown, Patrick H., 2022. "Mandatory information-based policy tools facilitate California farmers’ learning about nitrogen management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Kwek Choon Ling & Mary Lee Siew Cheng & Cham Kai Sin & Alina Yap May Ling & Zhang Li, 2023. "The Determinants of Digital Piracy Behaviour in Malaysia," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(3), pages 1-1, March.
    11. Cristel Joy G. Cayaban & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Satria Fadil Persada & Rianina D. Borres & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing & Reny Nadlifatin, 2023. "The Influence of Social Media and Sustainability Advocacy on the Purchase Intention of Filipino Consumers in Fast Fashion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Dumont, Aurélie & Ruiz, Julie & Campeau, Stéphane, 2026. "Trajectories of change for farmers to integrate agri-environmental practices: A longitudinal study of adoption dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    13. Jennifer Hayden & Sarah Rocker & Hannah Phillips & Bradley Heins & Andrew Smith & Kathleen Delate, 2018. "The Importance of Social Support and Communities of Practice: Farmer Perceptions of the Challenges and Opportunities of Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems on Organically Managed Farms in the Northern U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-26, December.
    14. Yevheniia Varyvoda & Allison Thomson & Jasmine Bruno, 2025. "Factors Influencing the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices in the U.S.: A Social Science Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Noeldeke, Beatrice, 2022. "Promoting Agroforestry in Rwanda: the Effects of Policy Interventions Derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-693, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    16. Eric R. Tacardon & Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Ma. Janice J. Gumasing, 2023. "The Perception of Food Quality and Food Value among the Purchasing Intentions of Street Foods in the Capital of the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Bartosz Bartkowski & Stephan Bartke, 2018. "Leverage Points for Governing Agricultural Soils: A Review of Empirical Studies of European Farmers’ Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, September.
    18. Shahzad Ahmad & Haiping Xu & E. M. B. P. Ekanayake, 2023. "Socioeconomic Determinants and Perceptions of Smallholder Farmers towards Agroforestry Adoption in Northern Irrigated Plain, Pakistan," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, April.
    19. Hyland, John J. & Heanue, Kevin & McKillop, Jessica & Micha, Evgenia, 2018. "Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 562-571.
    20. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s026483772600027x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.