IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics0264837726000268.html

Ecological engineering projects significantly enhanced vegetation recovery: A case study from the Jinsha River Basin (Yunnan section), China

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, An
  • He, Suling
  • Cheng, Yuyin
  • Ma, Jun
  • Wang, Jinliang
  • Deng, Yuncheng
  • Xu, Haichao
  • Wang, Hui

Abstract

The Jinsha River Basin (JRB) has a good vegetation coverage and plays an important role in maintaining the ecological environment in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. In this study, the effectiveness of ecological engineering implementation in the Yunnan section of the JRB was analysed from the three aspects of fractional vegetation cover (FVC), vegetation restoration potential achievement degree (VRPAD) and ecological land, and residual analysis was used to analyse the effects of ecological engineering and climate on vegetation. The results revealed that: (1) From 1990 to 2023, the interannual FVC and VRPAD were 0.65 and 0.5, respectively, and the growth rates of VFPAD and FVC were 0.32 % and 0.39 %, respectively. (2) The average annual area of ecological land was 82.05 × 10 ³ km², with a mean annual growth rate of 0.04 %, and an overall increase of 1.18 × 10 ³ km². The forestland and wetland areas both tended to increase, whereas the grassland area continued to decrease. (3) Spatially, the area of increased FVC was 70.52 % and the area of decreased FVC was 25.22 %. Compared with the period from 1990 to 2000, the VRPAD from 2000 to 2023 showed a transition from non-significant increase to a significant increase. (4) From 1990 to 2000, the area of vegetation positively affected by ecological engineering accounted for 57.39 %, and the area of vegetation negatively affected by anthropogenic activities accounted for 40.24 %. From 2000 to 2023, the area of vegetation positively affected by ecological engineering accounted for 68.28 %, and the area of vegetation negatively affected by anthropogenic activities accounted for 31.02 %. (4) In areas where vegetation improved, ecological restoration policies promoted the recovery of vegetation, which accounted for the largest area (51.88 %). In areas where vegetation has degraded, anthropogenic activities have led to vegetation degradation, accounting for the largest area (54.21 %). In the future, the influence of natural factors and human activities should be incorporated into the formulation of ecological policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, An & He, Suling & Cheng, Yuyin & Ma, Jun & Wang, Jinliang & Deng, Yuncheng & Xu, Haichao & Wang, Hui, 2026. "Ecological engineering projects significantly enhanced vegetation recovery: A case study from the Jinsha River Basin (Yunnan section), China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000268
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000268
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.