IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v164y2026ics0264837726000037.html

The cost of ecological protection and restoration: Evidence from the impact of the Shan-shui project on land values

Author

Listed:
  • Shibo, Zeng
  • Gui, Jin

Abstract

Protecting and restoring ecosystems is a key pathway for reducing biodiversity loss globally. These measures are perceived to conflict with the interests of land resource allocation. This study evaluated the economic consequences of the most extensive and stringent ecological space regulation and restoration tool in Chinese history—the Shan-shui project. This study compiled data from 2016 to 2022 on China's ecological protection and restoration efforts and micro-level land transactions, and used a spatial regression discontinuity design to estimate how land use restrictions affect land transfer values. This study found that the Shan-shui project had a significant negative impact on overall land transfer value. The "dual decline" in land demand from both enterprises and residents serves as a key mechanism through which market actors respond to the decline in land transfer prices triggered by government regulatory measures. The price-suppressing effect of the Shan-shui project shows significant variation. Although this effect is not observed in the commercial land sector, it is statistically significant in both residential and industrial land. Moreover, the price impact of water-related projects is substantially stronger than the average effect observed across all project types. In summary, these findings provide new insights into understanding the impact of ecological protection and restoration on resource allocation and alleviating the conflict between development and protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Shibo, Zeng & Gui, Jin, 2026. "The cost of ecological protection and restoration: Evidence from the impact of the Shan-shui project on land values," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000037
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000037
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:164:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.