Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Ning
- Yang, Zeguo
- Wang, Hongzhou
- Duan, Huabo
- Yang, Jiakuan
Abstract
As the world accelerates its low-carbon transition, the rapid expansion of centralized solar photovoltaics (PV) has received extensive concerns on land-use competition and environmental trade-offs. Here we construct a spatially explicit assessment framework to quantify the ecological and economic implications of PV land occupation across 367 mainland Chinese cities in 31 provinces. We integrate high-resolution PV infrastructure mapping with baseline land-use classifications and region-specific indicators of land productivity, economic output, and terrestrial carbon sequestration. This combined dataset is used to estimate land occupation, food loss, and reductions in terrestrial carbon sinks, and to design city-level spatial optimization and wind–solar substitution scenarios. enabling a comprehensive. By 2020, centralized PV installations occupied 1910 ± 116 km2 of land, and the footprint is projected to exceed 30,000 km2 by 2060. While grasslands and barren lands comprise the largest shares by area, cropland, occupying only 22 % of the total land, accounts for most agricultural and carbon sink losses due to its high biomass productivity. Moreover, the study also identified widespread land–value mismatches, where many cities disproportionately convert their most economically valuable land. City-level spatial optimization scenarios show that relocating 30 % of PV to lower-value land could halve food and carbon sink losses, and that substituting terrestrial and offshore wind for PV in selected cities could probably reduce land use by more than 90 %. These findings highlight the need to integrate ecological and economic value into solar siting and national decarbonization planning.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Ning & Yang, Zeguo & Wang, Hongzhou & Duan, Huabo & Yang, Jiakuan, 2026.
"Rethinking and reconciling the land–energy conflicts from centralized photovoltaics in China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:163:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000098
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107925
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:163:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.