IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v163y2026ics0264837726000074.html

Characteristics and key drivers of virtual urban land flows in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Haimeng
  • Xiong, Jieyang
  • Song, Tao

Abstract

Understanding virtual urban land flows is crucial for assessing the environmental impacts of urbanization (SDG 11), optimizing land resource use (SDG 12), and addressing regional inequalities (SDG 10). This study employs an environmentally extended multi-regional input–output model to quantify interprovincial virtual urban land flows in China for 2007, 2012, and 2017, links them to actual urban built-up land to reveal the urban human-nature relationship. Social network analysis is used to reveal the overall spatial structure of flow networks and identify critical provinces, while Poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation is applied to explore key drivers. The results show that virtual urban land embedded in interprovincial trade has become a structurally important component of China’s urbanization, with flows expanding rapidly and accounting for about 30 % of national urban built-up land. On average, 46.58 % of provinces’ urban land demand is met by other provinces. Flows are predominantly domestic and spatially uneven, with net transfers from eastern and northeastern provinces to central and western regions, where virtual land consumption in many cases exceeds local built-up land. The virtual land network has become denser and more interconnected over time, yet clear east–west and north–south gradients in centrality persist. Economic development, urban population density, migration, and fiscal capacity promote virtual land flows, whereas technological innovation reduces them, and spatial distance plays a relatively weak role. This study sheds new light on the telecoupled dynamics linking regional trade and urban expansion. The methodological framework is readily transferable to other countries and regions, and the findings offer practical guidance for policymakers seeking to optimize regional urbanization, industrial layout, and urban land management in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Haimeng & Xiong, Jieyang & Song, Tao, 2026. "Characteristics and key drivers of virtual urban land flows in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:163:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000074
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837726000074
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.107923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Chen, Guoqian, 2023. "Globalization of forest land use: Increasing threats on climate-vulnerable regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Jillian M. Deines & Xiao Liu & Jianguo Liu, 2016. "Telecoupling in urban water systems: an examination of Beijing’s imported water supply," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 251-270, March.
    3. Shaikh, M. Abdullah & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Geyik, Ozge & Bryan, Brett A., 2024. "Assessing global agri-food system exceedance of national cropland limits for linking responsible consumption and production under SDG 12," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Su, Dan & Cao, Yu & Wang, Jiayi & Fang, Xiaoqian & Wu, Qing, 2023. "Toward constructing an eco-account of cultivated land by quantifying the resources flow and eco-asset transfer in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Tukker, Arnold & Poliakov, Evgueni & Heijungs, Reinout & Hawkins, Troy & Neuwahl, Frederik & Rueda-Cantuche, José M. & Giljum, Stefan & Moll, Stephan & Oosterhaven, Jan & Bouwmeester, Maaike, 2009. "Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1928-1937, May.
    6. James E. Anderson & Eric van Wincoop, 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(1), pages 170-192, March.
    7. Kryczka, Piotr, 2024. "Unravelling the paradox of spatial homogeneity: An analysis of land use planning and monofunctional development in Wroclaw, Poland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Kunpeng Wang & Wenjun Wu & Awais Jabbar & Zinabu Wolde & Minghao Ou, 2021. "Dynamic Evolution and Spatial Convergence of the Virtual Cultivated Land Flow Intensity in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    10. Neil M. Coe & Peter Dicken & Martin Hess, 2008. "Global production networks: realizing the potential," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 271-295, May.
    11. Brenner, Anna-Katharina & Haas, Willi & Krüger, Tobias & Matej, Sarah & Haberl, Helmut & Schug, Franz & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Behnisch, Martin & Jaeger, Jochen A.G. & Pichler, Melanie, 2024. "What drives densification and sprawl in cities? A spatially explicit assessment for Vienna, between 1984 and 2018," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    12. Taozhen Huang & Yan Li & Qiaoliang Zhang & Ahmed Farouk, 2021. "Evolution of China’s Interprovincial Water Flow Network," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-6, October.
    13. Xiaoping Liu & Yinghuai Huang & Xiaocong Xu & Xuecao Li & Xia Li & Philippe Ciais & Peirong Lin & Kai Gong & Alan D. Ziegler & Anping Chen & Peng Gong & Jun Chen & Guohua Hu & Yimin Chen & Shaojian Wa, 2020. "High-spatiotemporal-resolution mapping of global urban change from 1985 to 2015," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 564-570, July.
    14. Mastrosavvas, Andreas, 2024. "Social Networks and Brexit: Evidence from a Trade Shock," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    15. Chao Bao & Mutian Xu & Siao Sun, 2019. "China’s Land Uses in the Multi-Region Input–Output Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Cailleux, Lauriane, 2025. "The engagement of environmental organizations on land policies: A case study of Pro Natura, Switzerland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Qiang, Wenli & Niu, Shuwen & Liu, Aimin & Kastner, Thomas & Bie, Qiang & Wang, Xiang & Cheng, Shengkui, 2020. "Trends in global virtual land trade in relation to agricultural products," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Penghui Jiang & Qianwen Cheng & Yuan Gong & Liyan Wang & Yunqian Zhang & Liang Cheng & Manchun Li & Jiancheng Lu & Yuewei Duan & Qiuhao Huang & Dong Chen, 2016. "Using Urban Development Boundaries to Constrain Uncontrolled Urban Sprawl in China," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 106(6), pages 1321-1343, November.
    19. Jieyang Xiong & Liwei Wang & Tao Song & Haimeng Liu, 2024. "Visualising trade-related virtual urban land transfers in China," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 696-700, December.
    20. Sergio Correia & Paulo Guimarães & Tom Zylkin, 2020. "Fast Poisson estimation with high-dimensional fixed effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 95-115, March.
    21. Guo, Shan & Wang, Yao & Shen, Geoffrey Q.P. & Zhang, Bo & Wang, Hao, 2020. "Virtual built-up land transfers embodied in China’s interregional trade," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    22. Jianjian He & Siqi Wang & Reinout Heijungs & Yi Yang & Shumiao Shu & Weiwen Zhang & Anqi Xu & Kai Fang, 2024. "Interprovincial food trade aggravates China’s land scarcity," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    23. Feifei Tan & Fuxing Xu & Shouzhen Bao & Zhiyuan Niu, 2025. "Carbon‐trade nexus: The embodied carbon emission transfer network of China's sustainable development demonstration belt," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 621-635, February.
    24. Tian, Xu & Bruckner, Martin & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2019. "Trends and driving forces of China’s virtual land consumption and trade," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaomei Fan & Hongguang Liu & Mengmeng Wang, 2022. "Study on the Agricultural Land Transfer Embodied in Inter-Provincial Trade in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Ben Shepherd, 2021. "Effective Rates of Protection in a World With Non-Tariff Measures and Supply Chains: Evidence from ASEAN," Working Papers DP-2021-27, Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA).
    3. Agostino Capponi & Zhaonan Qu, 2025. "Handling Sparse Non-negative Data in Finance," Papers 2509.01478, arXiv.org.
    4. Beniamino Quintieri & Giovanni Stamato, 2023. "Are preferential agreements beneficial to EU trade? New evidence from the EU–South Korea treaty," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(12), pages 3511-3541, December.
    5. Mahdi Ghodsi & Robert Stehrer, 2022. "Trade policy and global value chains: tariffs versus non-tariff measures," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(3), pages 887-916, August.
    6. J. M. C. Santos Silva & Silvana Tenreyro, 2022. "The Log of Gravity at 15," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 21(3), pages 423-437, September.
    7. Harald Oberhofer & Michael Pfaffermayr & Yvonne Wolfmayr, 2021. "Die Auswirkungen des Brexit auf Österreichs Wirtschaft," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66782.
    8. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "A micro-macro model of foreign direct investment: knowledge-based gravity forces, self-selection and third-country effects," MPRA Paper 115542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Tyazhelnikov, Vladimir & Romalis, John, 2024. "Russian counter-sanctions and smuggling: Forensics with structural gravity estimation," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Natalie Chen & Dennis Novy, 2022. "Gravity and Heterogeneous Trade Cost Elasticities," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 132(644), pages 1349-1377.
    11. Federico Carril-Caccia & Jordi Paniagua & Francisco Requena, 2021. "Asylum Migration, Borders, and Terrorism in a Structural Gravity Model," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 146-158.
    12. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Explaining foreign direct investment patterns: a testable micro-macro gravity model for FDI," MPRA Paper 115273, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Jordi Paniagua & Cristina Villó & Maria Escrivà-Beltran, 2022. "Cross-Border Higher Education: The Expansion of International Branch Campuses," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 63(6), pages 1037-1057, September.
    14. Weidner, Martin & Zylkin, Thomas, 2021. "Bias and consistency in three-way gravity models," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    15. Ziyu Yi & Long Wei & Xuan Huang, 2022. "Does Information-and-Communication-Technology Market Openness Promote Digital Service Exports?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Kim, Dongin & Steinbach, Sandro & Zurita, Carlos, 2024. "Deep trade agreements and agri-food global value chain integration," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Andrzej Cieślik & Oleg Gurshev, 2022. "Friends with or without benefits? An empirical evaluation of bilateral trade and economic integration between some of the post-Soviet economies," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 769-795, December.
    18. Lin Jones & Serge Shikher & Yoto Yotov, 2026. "Determinants of Intermediate Goods Trade," Working Papers 202603, Center for Global Policy Analysis, LeBow College of Business, Drexel University.
    19. Sadok ACHOUR & Dr. Fatima HADJI, 2021. "Determinants of trade flows to Agadir Agreement countries: gravity model three-way approach," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(627), S), pages 125-134, Summer.
    20. Holger Breinlich & Valentina Corradi & Nadia Rocha & Michele Ruta & Joao M.C. Santos Silva & Tom Zylkin, 2021. "Machine Learning in International Trade Research ?- Evaluating the Impact of Trade Agreements," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0521, School of Economics, University of Surrey.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:163:y:2026:i:c:s0264837726000074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.