IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v158y2025ics026483772500300x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is green gentrification a pernicious paradox in the urban greening process?

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jie
  • Hu, Yecui
  • Zhang, Xiaoling

Abstract

Urban greening is anticipated to yield significant benefits for city dwellers. However, if the distribution of these environmental enhancements is unequal, the expected positive benefits of urban greening will not be fully realized. Worse still, it may lead to the manifestation of environmental inequity and social conflicts. Ensuring social equity alongside environmental improvement is therefore crucial. Green gentrification, being a dynamic process, poses considerable challenges for quantitative assessment and cross-regional comparative analysis. This study investigates the green gentrification within China’s three major urban agglomerations. By integrating the remote sensing data of urban greening with the micro-level demographic and socio-economic indicators, we employ the Propensity Score Matching-Difference in Differences method (PSM-DID) to quantify the potential gentrification effects caused by urban greening initiatives. Empirical results reveal the potential green gentrification in urban greening process, reflected in elevated proportions of residents with urban household registration and highly educated population, and rising residential land prices in greening sub-districts. The manifestation of gentrification exhibits divergent patterns among the three urban agglomerations. Notably, sub-districts with higher baseline greenness levels do not exhibit green gentrification. This study offers empirical evidence from the Global South, validating the green gentrification discourse within China’s top-down urban sustainability paradigm. It also presents a comparative analysis highlighting the heterogeneity of green gentrification outcomes. These findings hold important implications for urban planners and policymakers in China and other rapidly urbanizing Global South regions, calling for equitable green planning, phased greening strategies, and inclusive participatory processes to balance environmental upgrades with environmental justice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jie & Hu, Yecui & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2025. "Is green gentrification a pernicious paradox in the urban greening process?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500300x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772500300X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500300x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.