Author
Listed:
- Silva, Tatiane Camila Martins
- Cardoso, Luiz Edinelson Cardoso e
- Rodrigues, Renato Augusto Soares
- Silva, José Maria Cardoso da
- Vieira, Ima Célia Guimarães
Abstract
Conservation compliance on private lands is critical for preserving biodiversity in regions where protected areas are insufficient. We assessed compliance with Brazil's Native Vegetation Protection Law by analyzing 14,713 rural properties in the Guamá River Basin, Eastern Amazon. Our findings reveal alarmingly low compliance rates, with only 8.3 % of properties meeting both Legal Reserve (LR) and Permanent Protected Area (PPA) requirements. Using Cragg hurdle regression models, we identified that property size positively influences LR compliance but shows no significant effect on PPA compliance. Neighborhood effects strongly impact LR compliance, suggesting spatial clustering of conservation behavior. Distance from administrative centers and infrastructure demonstrates complex relationships with compliance, with properties distant from main roads showing increased likelihood of initial LR compliance but decreased PPA compliance levels. These patterns reveal that enforcement strategies should be tailored to both property characteristics and conservation requirement types. Our research suggests focusing conservation efforts on properties clustered around shared conservation targets, implementing geospatial monitoring technologies, and strengthening state capacity for enforcement to improve compliance in this critical biogeographic region.
Suggested Citation
Silva, Tatiane Camila Martins & Cardoso, Luiz Edinelson Cardoso e & Rodrigues, Renato Augusto Soares & Silva, José Maria Cardoso da & Vieira, Ima Célia Guimarães, 2025.
"Compliance with mandatory conservation policies among rural properties in the Eastern Amazon,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002935
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107759
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.