IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v158y2025ics0264837725002844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The monetization of soil: An emerging imperative?

Author

Listed:
  • Certini, Giacomo
  • Grilli, Gianluca
  • Scalenghe, Riccardo

Abstract

This Viewpoint proposes assigning explicit economic value to soil—not merely as a platform for infrastructure but as a finite, three-dimensional resource crucial to food production and ecosystem services provision. Unlike water or air, soil is rarely accounted for its fundamental environmental importance. To fill this gap, we advocate a Total Economic Value framework spanning use, option and non-use benefits, which, contrary to conventional land appraisal, considers soil thickness, density and quality. Embedding these metrics in policy instruments, markets and land transactions could reward conservation and drive sustainable management. While challenges such as spatial heterogeneity, market design and equity persist, pricing soil can shift social perceptions, curb degradation and foster practices that rebuild soil health. Recognising our shared economic stake in soil is not just theory, but an essential step toward safeguarding a routinely neglected natural asset.

Suggested Citation

  • Certini, Giacomo & Grilli, Gianluca & Scalenghe, Riccardo, 2025. "The monetization of soil: An emerging imperative?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002844
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002844
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107750?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.