Author
Listed:
- Bellil, Anissa
- Foltête, Jean-Christophe
- Vuidel, Gilles
- Comby, Emeline
- Savary, Paul
Abstract
Conservation measures integrated into planning documents are designed for the protection and management of natural habitats. They are part of planning strategies for maintaining biodiversity and the functional connectivity of habitat networks. However, spatial planning strategies need to consider a wide range of socio-economic requirements in addition to biodiversity issues. This leads to a mismatch between the planning documents emerging from stakeholders’ discussions and the most ecologically relevant conservation strategies for habitat networks. Here, we use a generic spatial modelling approach based on landscape graphs to model forest habitat networks in four areas matching the boundaries of French inter-municipal planning instruments (SCoTs). This enables us to consistently compare our modelling outputs with the habitat networks defined in the corresponding planning documents, for a representative set of ecological profiles. Independently, we assess ecological connectivity using metrics focusing on several key components of habitat connectivity, i.e., habitat patch area, inter-patch dispersal, and network traversability. Our results reveal both similarities and differences among SCoTs in the way they map and conserve habitat networks for different species profiles. The SCoTs differed particularly in the importance accorded to each component of habitat connectivity, although the metric related to habitat area was overall well accounted for. Our connectivity modelling framework provides a testing ground to support decision-making when mapping spatial habitat networks for biodiversity conservation and land-use planning.
Suggested Citation
Bellil, Anissa & Foltête, Jean-Christophe & Vuidel, Gilles & Comby, Emeline & Savary, Paul, 2025.
"Using landscape graphs to assess the ecological relevance of biodiversity conservation plans for forest habitat networks,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002741
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107740
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.