Author
Listed:
- Makate, Clifton
- Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine
Abstract
Conservation Agriculture (CA) can promote sustainable smallholder farming by improving yields, enhancing climate resilience and reducing the adverse environmental impact of production. Although the economic dimensions of CA have been extensively studied, its contributions to social and environmental outcomes, such as labour demand and soil health, remain largely unexplored. This study investigates the implementation of CA practices on cultivated plots and their contributions to labour use, productivity, and soil erosion. Using a nationally representative household plot-panel dataset of 2117 households and 10,075 cultivated plots in Zimbabwe, multinomial endogenous switching regression models, incorporating an ordered probit selection rule to address selection bias, were employed to analyse the uptake and associations of varying levels of CA adoption on labour use, productivity, and soil erosion. CA adoption packages (compared to non-adoption) are associated with improved cereal productivity under normal rainfall but provide limited gains for legumes and under flooding. CA packages characterized by increased minimum tillage and herbicide use are linked to labour savings and a reduced family labour burden, yet also to a greater dependence on external (hired/exchange) labour. Minimal CA adoption (using only one practice) is linked to higher labour use, lower productivity, and increased soil erosion compared to non-adoption. CA adoption on flood-exposed plots is correlated with increased soil erosion. Exposure to climate shocks, poor soil fertility, and better resource endowments are associated with higher CA adoption, while insecure land tenure and limited market access are linked to lower adoption. Tailoring CA interventions to local conditions and structural realities is essential for achieving overall sustainability.
Suggested Citation
Makate, Clifton & Hanyani-Mlambo, Benjamine, 2025.
"Conservation Agriculture and sustainability of smallholder farms in Zimbabwe: Insights from a nationwide survey,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500273x
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107739
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500273x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.