IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v158y2025ics0264837725002637.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From informality to influence: Nonlinear disturbances and institutional modulation in China's urban land supply

Author

Listed:
  • Xin, Zhang
  • Chen, Zhigang
  • Kwan, Mei-Po

Abstract

Shadow land markets are widespread in developing countries but remain insufficiently understood in terms of their behavioral and institutional impacts on formal land systems. Existing studies often emphasize structural constraints or macro-level distortions, overlooking how informal land activities generate institutional signals that reshape the expectations and actions of both developers and governments. Moreover, few studies have examined the nonlinear effects of shadow market expansion or how institutional mechanisms modulate these dynamics. Addressing these research gaps, this study proposes the Shadow Signal–Response–Governance (SSRG) model to explain how shadow markets function as signal systems that influence formal land prices and supply decisions. Drawing on panel data from 31 Chinese provinces (1999–2022), we identify nonlinear relationships—U-shaped for land prices and inverted U-shaped for land supply—and reveal the asymmetric moderating roles of fiscal incentives and regulatory enforcement. Fiscal dependence dampens governments' responsiveness to informal signals, while land inspections intensify demand-side perceptions of shadow market signals. These findings advance land governance theory by integrating behavioral economics and institutional modulation into the analysis of informality, offering a dynamic and policy-relevant understanding of how shadow markets affect formal land governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin, Zhang & Chen, Zhigang & Kwan, Mei-Po, 2025. "From informality to influence: Nonlinear disturbances and institutional modulation in China's urban land supply," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002637
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.