Author
Listed:
- Su, Yingqing
- Xia, Honghua
- Feng, Qi
- Liu, Wei
- Zhang, Pengyi
- Zhang, Jutao
- Zhu, Meng
- Cheng, Wenju
- Yin, Xinwei
Abstract
The current policy for evaluating protected areas is static and greatly limited, as it fails to account for mid-term to long-term decadal climate change impacts on species protection and ecosystem services. Here we employed an integrated multi-model framework combining system dynamics, land use simulation (PLUS), ecosystem service valuation (InVEST), species distribution modeling (BIOMOD2), and conservation prioritization (Zonation) to assess how biodiversity and ecosystem services within dryland protected areas may change over time under climate scenarios, while identifying climate refugia to explore potential design options for current protected area configurations in drylands. Our results indicate that current protected areas cover only 14 % of drylands under present climate conditions, leaving critical species and ecosystem services at risk. Considering ongoing climate change, 84.98 % of drylands are projected to remain unprotected by 2100, even under the optimistic Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSP126). Through systematic conservation planning, our analysis reveals that optimizing protected areas could effectively safeguard 75 % of species and preserve essential ecosystem services within 25 % ± 2 % of dryland landscapes. Our results provide operational policy pathways suggesting that climate-smart design of protected area configurations in drylands can enhance conservation policy resilience and implementation effectiveness, thereby offering evidence-based solutions to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem services under global change.
Suggested Citation
Su, Yingqing & Xia, Honghua & Feng, Qi & Liu, Wei & Zhang, Pengyi & Zhang, Jutao & Zhu, Meng & Cheng, Wenju & Yin, Xinwei, 2025.
"Climate-smart protected areas in drylands can effectively safeguard biodiversity without expanding boundaries,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002571
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107723
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:158:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.