IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v157y2025ics0264837725002091.html

Agroforestry systems across elevational gradients in northern Iran

Author

Listed:
  • Ghanbari, Sajad
  • Aghayari, Farshid
  • Mohamadi, Yousef
  • Sasanifar, Samira
  • Rincón, Víctor
  • Velázquez, Javier

Abstract

Agroforestry systems, by promoting biodiversity and optimizing resource use, can enhance ecosystem services and mitigate environmental challenges across different elevation zones, from lowlands to high-altitude regions. By examining the role of agroforestry across elevational gradients, this paper seeks to highlight the potential of agroforestry systems in addressing the challenges and opportunities faced by farmers in different altitude zones. To achieve this, two provinces within the Hyrcanian region were selected: Mazandaran (Kalardasht County), representing the semi-humid highlands, and Guilan (Rasht County), representing the humid lowlands. This study was conducted in two sections: socio-economic and biological evaluation. 116 questionnaires were completed, with 56 from the uplands and 60 from the lowland regions. To analyze and compare biodiversity, indices such as richness (Taxa_S), diversity (Shannon_H), and equitability (Equitability_J) were calculated. Results shows that about 93 % and 69 % of farmers were involved in agroforestry activities in lowlands and uplands, respectively. In upland area, the most commonly planted species is poplar (47 %), followed by walnut and peach (both 11.7 %). Other species, such as sour cherry and pine, are less common. In lowlands, poplar is also the most prevalent species (65.5 %), followed by walnut (14.7 %) and orange (8.2 %). The results showed that the density in lowlands (66 ± 74 trees per hectare) was lower than in uplands (403 ± 127 trees per hectare). The taxa index in lowland (1.5 ± 0.18) was lower than in upland (3.46 ± 0.38), suggesting a lower species diversity in Rasht compared to upland. The variation in forest characteristics across elevation zones also has important implications for agroforestry and conservation strategies. In lowland areas, where tree volume and basal area are higher, agroforestry systems can be designed to maximize tree productivity, potentially providing greater carbon sequestration benefits. In upland regions, however, efforts might focus on enhancing tree density and species diversity to compensate for slower growth rates and reduced biomass. Additionally, managing these differences through targeted conservation and land-use practices is crucial for sustaining biodiversity and ecosystem services across different altitudinal gradients

Suggested Citation

  • Ghanbari, Sajad & Aghayari, Farshid & Mohamadi, Yousef & Sasanifar, Samira & Rincón, Víctor & Velázquez, Javier, 2025. "Agroforestry systems across elevational gradients in northern Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002091
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002091
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mosquera-Losada, M.R. & Santiago-Freijanes, J.J. & Rois-Díaz, M. & Moreno, G. & den Herder, M. & Aldrey-Vázquez, J.A. & Ferreiro-Domínguez, N. & Pantera, A. & Pisanelli, A. & Rigueiro-Rodríguez, A., 2018. "Agroforestry in Europe: A land management policy tool to combat climate change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 603-613.
    2. Felton, Michelle & Jones, Philip & Tranter, Richard & Clark, Joanna & Quaife, Tristan & Lukac, Martin, 2023. "Farmers’ attitudes towards, and intentions to adopt, agroforestry on farms in lowland South-East and East England," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    3. Maya Sollen-Norrlin & Bhim Bahadur Ghaley & Naomi Laura Jane Rintoul, 2020. "Agroforestry Benefits and Challenges for Adoption in Europe and Beyond," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    4. Stergios Tampekis & Apostolos Kantartzis & Garyfallos Arabatzis & Stavros Sakellariou & Georgios Kolkos & Chrisovalantis Malesios, 2024. "Conceptualizing Forest Operations Planning and Management Using Principles of Functional Complex Systems Science to Increase the Forest’s Ability to Withstand Climate Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Rasul, Golam & Thapa, Gopal B., 2006. "Financial and economic suitability of agroforestry as an alternative to shifting cultivation: The case of the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 29-50, November.
    6. Alejandro del Pozo & Nidia Brunel-Saldias & Alejandra Engler & Samuel Ortega-Farias & Cesar Acevedo-Opazo & Gustavo A. Lobos & Roberto Jara-Rojas & Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, 2019. "Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies of Agriculture in Mediterranean-Climate Regions (MCRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Stavros Tsiantikoudis & Eleni Zafeiriou & Grigorios Kyriakopoulos & Garyfallos Arabatzis, 2019. "Revising the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Deforestation: An Empirical Study for Bulgaria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Molua, Ernest L., 2005. "The economics of tropical agroforestry systems: the case of agroforestry farms in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 199-211, February.
    9. Daryanto, Stefani & Wang, Lixin & Jacinthe, Pierre-André, 2017. "Global synthesis of drought effects on cereal, legume, tuber and root crops production: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 18-33.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vizinho, André & Avelar, David & Fonseca, Ana Lúcia & Carvalho, Silvia & Sucena-Paiva, Leonor & Pinho, Pedro & Nunes, Alice & Branquinho, Cristina & Vasconcelos, Ana Cátia & Santos, Filipe Duarte & Ro, 2021. "Framing the application of Adaptation Pathways for agroforestry in Mediterranean drylands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Datta, Pritha & Behera, Bhagirath & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2024. "India's approach to agroforestry as an effective strategy in the context of climate change: An evaluation of 28 state climate change action plans," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Hanan Ali Alrteimei & Zulfa Hanan Ash’aari & Farrah Melissa Muharram, 2022. "Last Decade Assessment of the Impacts of Regional Climate Change on Crop Yield Variations in the Mediterranean Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Dmuchowski, Wojciech & Baczewska-Dąbrowska, Aneta H. & Gworek, Barbara, 2024. "The role of temperate agroforestry in mitigating climate change: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Oliveira-Xavier, Aymeric & Calmé, Sophie & Gravel, Dominique, 2025. "The land-blending strategy: Contribution of metapopulation theory to the land sparing-sharing debate," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    6. Andis Bārdulis & Jānis Ivanovs & Arta Bārdule & Dagnija Lazdiņa & Dana Purviņa & Aldis Butlers & Andis Lazdiņš, 2022. "Assessment of Agricultural Areas Suitable for Agroforestry in Latvia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Barnes, A.P. & McMillan, J. & Sutherland, L.-A. & Hopkins, J. & Thomson, S.G., 2022. "Farmer intentional pathways for net zero carbon: Exploring the lock-in effects of forestry and renewables," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    9. He Jian & Hu Hao & Pan Haize & Liu Chuan & Li Xiaoqin & Wei Yan & Jiang Haidan & Zhang Changliang, 2022. "Research on brownfield redevelopment based on Wuli-Shili-Renli system theory and catastrophe progression method," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Mahbubul Alam & Yasushi Furukawa & Kazuhiro Harada, 2010. "Agroforestry as a sustainable landuse option in degraded tropical forests: a study from Bangladesh," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 147-158, April.
    11. Alejandro del Pozo & Nidia Brunel-Saldias & Alejandra Engler & Samuel Ortega-Farias & Cesar Acevedo-Opazo & Gustavo A. Lobos & Roberto Jara-Rojas & Marco A. Molina-Montenegro, 2019. "Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies of Agriculture in Mediterranean-Climate Regions (MCRs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    12. Ahammad, Ronju & Hossain, Mohammed Kamal & Sobhan, Istiak & Hasan, Rakibul & Biswas, Shekhar R. & Mukul, Sharif A., 2023. "Social-ecological and institutional factors affecting forest and landscape restoration in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Ndip, Francis Ebai & Molua, Ernest L. & Mvodo, Meyo-Elise Stephanie & Nkendah, Robert & Djomo Choumbou, Raoul Fani & Tabetando, Rayner & Akem, Nina Fabinin, 2023. "Farmland Fragmentation, crop diversification and incomes in Cameroon, a Congo Basin country," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    14. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    15. Yvoz, Séverin & Lechenet, Martin & Amiotte-Suchet, Philippe & Castel, Thierry & Betting, Elisa & Ubertosi, Marjorie, 2025. "Assessing crop water deficiency for regional adaptation to climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    16. Paolo Vassallo & Claudia Turcato & Ilaria Rigo & Claudia Scopesi & Andrea Costa & Matteo Barcella & Giulia Dapueto & Mauro Mariotti & Chiara Paoli, 2021. "Biophysical Accounting of Forests’ Value under Different Management Regimes: Conservation vs. Exploitation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Christoph Schulze & Katarzyna Zagórska & Kati Häfner & Olimpia Markiewicz & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Bettina Matzdorf, 2024. "Using farmers' ex ante preferences to design agri‐environmental contracts: A systematic review," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 44-83, February.
    18. Li, Baoru & Zhang, Xiying & Morita, Shigenori & Sekiya, Nobuhito & Araki, Hideki & Gu, Huijie & Han, Jie & Lu, Yang & Liu, Xiuwei, 2022. "Are crop deep roots always beneficial for combating drought: A review of root structure and function, regulation and phenotyping," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    19. Sanga, G.J. & Mungatana, E.D., 2016. "Integrating ecology and economics in understanding responses in securing land-use externalities internalization in water catchments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 28-39.
    20. Göran Bostedt & Agneta Hörnell & Gert Nyberg, 2016. "Agroforestry extension and dietary diversity – an analysis of the importance of fruit and vegetable consumption in West Pokot, Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 271-284, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.