IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v157y2025ics0264837725002017.html

Proximity, politics, and preferences: Spatial and contextual patterns in management opinions for an imperiled multifunctional landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Netherton-Morrison, Haley K.
  • Williamson, Matthew A.
  • Burnham, Morey
  • Som Castellano, Rebecca L.
  • Hopping, Kelly A.

Abstract

Landscape governance is challenged by a range of factors, including the uneven spatial distribution of people, their identities, and ecosystems, in addition to mismatches in ecological boundaries, jurisdictional boundaries, and the spatial extent of readily available public opinion data. Using Idaho’s sagebrush steppe as an illustrative example of the patchwork of actors and ownership that exists in imperiled multifunctional landscapes, we aim to identify perceived threats to sagebrush steppe, develop county-level estimates of preferences for and acceptability of sagebrush steppe management strategies, evaluate the roles of political and ecological predictors for attitudes toward sagebrush steppe management, and assess the potential social-ecological implications of management preferences and associated acceptability. We modeled sagebrush steppe management attitudes from a statewide survey (N = 1048) using both multilevel regression and poststratification and multinomial logistic regression. Our results reveal four opportunities and challenges to landscape governance in Idaho’s sagebrush steppe and beyond: (1) the implementation of preferred management strategies may be hindered by a lack of institutional fit, (2) regional patterns in attitudes underscore the need to consider the proximity of the impacts of decisions, (3) spatially-explicit approaches can help to disentangle the relative roles of socio-political and geographic predictors of environmental opinion, and (4) a shared desire to protect sagebrush steppe may transcend ideological differences. These findings underscore the need for collaborative efforts to consider the local and extra-local socio-political contexts, build governance capacity and trust, and focus on finding common ground through shared values for more effective and transformative governance of multiple-use landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Netherton-Morrison, Haley K. & Williamson, Matthew A. & Burnham, Morey & Som Castellano, Rebecca L. & Hopping, Kelly A., 2025. "Proximity, politics, and preferences: Spatial and contextual patterns in management opinions for an imperiled multifunctional landscape," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002017
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107667
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725002017
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107667?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hjerpe, Evan & Armatas, Christopher A. & Haefele, Michelle, 2022. "Amenity-based development and protected areas in the American West," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Wulfhorst, J. D. & Rimbey, Neil R. & Darden, Tim D., 2003. "Social And Community Impacts Of Public Land Grazing Policy Alternatives In The Bruneau Resource Area Of Owyhee County, Idaho," A.E. Extension Series 304818, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    3. Gibson, Clark C. & Ostrom, Elinor & Ahn, T. K., 2000. "The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 217-239, February.
    4. Mark K. McBeth & Megan Warnement Wrobel & Irene van Woerden, 2023. "Political ideology and nuclear energy: Perception, proximity, and trust," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 88-118, January.
    5. Buttice, Matthew K. & Highton, Benjamin, 2013. "How Does Multilevel Regression and Poststratification Perform with Conventional National Surveys?," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 449-467.
    6. Floress, Kristin & Vokoun, Melinda & Huff, Emily Silver & Baker, Melissa, 2019. "Public perceptions of county, state, and national forest management in Wisconsin, USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 110-120.
    7. Tamara Krawchenko & John Tomaney, 2023. "The Governance of Land Use: A Conceptual Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, March.
    8. Peter D. Howe & Matto Mildenberger & Jennifer R. Marlon & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2015. "Geographic variation in opinions on climate change at state and local scales in the USA," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 596-603, June.
    9. Cyphers, Laren A. & Schultz, Courtney A., 2019. "Policy design to support cross-boundary land management: The example of the Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 362-369.
    10. Jeffrey R. Lax & Justin H. Phillips, 2009. "How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in The States?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 107-121, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matto Mildenberger & Jennifer R. Marlon & Peter D. Howe & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2017. "The spatial distribution of Republican and Democratic climate opinions at state and local scales," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 539-548, December.
    2. Matto Mildenberger & Peter Howe & Erick Lachapelle & Leah Stokes & Jennifer Marlon & Timothy Gravelle, 2016. "The Distribution of Climate Change Public Opinion in Canada," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Margaret Weden & Christine Peterson & Jeremy Miles & Regina Shih, 2015. "Evaluating Linearly Interpolated Intercensal Estimates of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics of U.S. Counties and Census Tracts 2001–2009," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(4), pages 541-559, August.
    4. Skinner, Benjamin T. & Doyle, William R., 2024. "Predicting postsecondary attendance by family income in the United States using multilevel regression with poststratification," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    5. Roberto Cerina & Raymond Duch, 2021. "Polling India via regression and post-stratification of non-probability online samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-34, November.
    6. Jinan N. Allan & Joseph T. Ripberger & Wesley Wehde & Makenzie Krocak & Carol L. Silva & Hank C. Jenkins‐Smith, 2020. "Geographic Distributions of Extreme Weather Risk Perceptions in the United States," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2498-2508, December.
    7. Donghui Wang & Yongai Jin & Tao Liu, 2025. "Universal yet local: Estimating county-level fertility ideals and intentions in China," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 53(18), pages 525-568.
    8. Elise Grieg, 2021. "Public opinion and special interests in American environmental politics," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 21/349, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    9. Mansoor Afzali & Gonul Colak & Sami Vähämaa, 2025. "Climate Change Denial and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 31-59, January.
    10. Marina Christofoletti & Tânia R. B. Benedetti & Felipe G. Mendes & Humberto M. Carvalho, 2021. "Using Multilevel Regression and Poststratification to Estimate Physical Activity Levels from Health Surveys," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.
    11. Robert Costanza & Shuang Liu, 2014. "Ecosystem Services and Environmental Governance: Comparing China and the U.S," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 160-170, January.
    12. Grillitsch, Markus & Asheim, Björn & Fünfschilling, Lea & Kelmenson, Sophie & Lowe, Nichola & Lundquist, Karl Johan & Mahmoud, Yahia & Martynovich, Mikhail & Mattson, Pauline & Miörner, Johan & Nilsso, 2023. "Rescaling: An Analytical Lense to Study Economic and Industrial Shifts," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/11, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    13. Hill, Genia & Zurek, Monika & Obersteiner, Michael, 2026. "From local landscapes to global: A cross-scale and cross-level framework for a more just food systems transformation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Christopher Muller & Daniel Schrage, 2014. "Mass Imprisonment and Trust in the Law," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 651(1), pages 139-158, January.
    15. S. Johnson & A. Asian & D. Luciano & Y. Kono & B. Van Ooijen & A. Campbell & B. Turner & W. Hook & J. Lieswyn & R. Rohatgi & A. Irvin, 2024. "Guide to Mobility for Livable Pacific Cities: Part 2," World Bank Publications - Reports 42300, The World Bank Group.
    16. Merrie, Andrew & Olsson, Per, 2014. "An innovation and agency perspective on the emergence and spread of Marine Spatial Planning," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 366-374.
    17. Steven M Manson, 2007. "Challenges in Evaluating Models of Geographic Complexity," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(2), pages 245-260, April.
    18. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Wang, Wei & Rothschild, David & Goel, Sharad & Gelman, Andrew, 2015. "Forecasting elections with non-representative polls," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 980-991.
    20. Jan E. DeWaters & Ingrid Zabel & Allison M. Chatrchyan & Stephen Bird & Susan E. Powers, 2025. "Building a Climate‐Literate Workforce: Impacts of a Comprehensive Public Utility Climate Change Education Program," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 4847-4860, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725002017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.