IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v157y2025ics0264837725001978.html

A Trojan horse in the last of the wild? Pine trees, agroforestry, and land zoning assemble the landscape resilience dilemma in Patagonia

Author

Listed:
  • Tröger, Danny
  • Braun, Andreas Christian

Abstract

The resilience of landscapes is increasingly compromised, even in the 'last wild areas', including cool temperate forests at higher latitudes. Deforestation, climate change and natural hazards are endangering biodiversity, carbon-storing soils, landscape identity and, not least, rural or indigenous livelihoods. In some places, attempts are being made to restore the landscape through reforestation. The question is to what extent this measure contributes to landscape resilience in the context of spatial management. In the Chilean Patagonian region of Aysén, for example, forest plantations with exotic tree species and spatial planning with land zoning are intended to ensure landscape resilience. Using a combination of conformance and performance approaches to plan evaluation, we analyse whether this set of instruments can address the risks of biodiversity and soil loss, land-use related natural hazards, and disregard for indigenous risk perceptions. We argue that although regional spatial planning in Aysén is committed to sustainable land use, land zoning is not in line with its environmental objectives of eradicating invasive species, is expected to perform poorly in mitigating erosion and natural hazards, and does not address local risk perceptions. This is particularly evident in the failure to develop the resilience potential that agroforestry practices could offer. The agroforestry concept is used as a land use category in land zoning to promote the expansion of further forest plantations with exotic tree species, which conflicts with local risk perceptions and traditional rural livelihoods. In this way, agroforestry can become a Trojan horse with limited or even counterproductive effects on landscape resilience. Inspired by the polycentric governance paradigm, we propose three alternative strategies: promoting regenerative agriculture with agroforestry under exclusion of exotic tree species, co-creation of risk related land zoning and community forest managment.

Suggested Citation

  • Tröger, Danny & Braun, Andreas Christian, 2025. "A Trojan horse in the last of the wild? Pine trees, agroforestry, and land zoning assemble the landscape resilience dilemma in Patagonia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001978
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001978
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Assche, Kristof & Birchall, Jeff & Gruezmacher, Monica, 2022. "Arctic and northern community governance: The need for local planning and design as resilience strategy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Jonathan R. Barton & Álvaro Román & Johannes Rehner, 2019. "Responsible research and innovation (RRI) in Chile: from a neostructural productivist imperative to sustainable regional development?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(12), pages 2510-2532, December.
    3. Katherine E Wyndham & Carmen-Paz Castro & Juan-Pablo Sarmiento, 2021. "From Disaster Risk Construction to Disaster Risk Reduction: Exploring the Agency of Urban Land-Use Planning in Chile," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 20-40, January.
    4. Moreira-Dantas, Ianna Raissa & Söder, Mareike, 2022. "Global deforestation revisited: The role of weak institutions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    5. Neyra Sosa & Alejandro Torres & Valerio Castro-Lopez & Alejandro Velazquez, 2023. "Participatory Landscape Conservation: A Case Study of a Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest in Michoacan, Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Popp, Alexander & Krause, Michael & Dietrich, Jan Philipp & Lotze-Campen, Hermann & Leimbach, Marian & Beringer, Tim & Bauer, Nico, 2012. "Additional CO2 emissions from land use change — Forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 64-70.
    7. Ethan Gordon & Federico Davila & Chris Riedy, 2022. "Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(2), pages 809-826, June.
    8. Iván Franchi-Arzola & Javier Martin-Vide & Cristián Henríquez, 2018. "Sustainability Assessment in Development Planning in Sub-National Territories: Regional Development Strategies in Chile," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-30, May.
    9. Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko & Muchhala, Bhumika, 2020. "The Southern origins of sustainable development goals: Ideas, actors, aspirations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    10. Nilsson, Måns & Persson, Åsa, 2012. "Reprint of “Can Earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection”," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 10-20.
    11. Nilsson, Måns & Persson, Åsa, 2012. "Can Earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 61-71.
    12. Morales Olmos, Virginia, 2022. "Forestry and the forest products sector: Production, income and employment, and international trade," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Tiffany H. Morrison & W. Neil Adger & Arun Agrawal & Katrina Brown & Matthew J. Hornsey & Terry P. Hughes & Meha Jain & Maria Carmen Lemos & Lucy Holmes McHugh & Saffron O’Neill & Derek Berkel, 2022. "Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(12), pages 1100-1106, December.
    14. Puppim de Oliveira, Jose A. & Fra.Paleo, Urbano, 2016. "Lost in participation: How local knowledge was overlooked in land use planning and risk governance in Tōhoku, Japan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 543-551.
    15. Murphy, Matthew & Danis, Wade M. & Mack, Johnny & Sayers, (Kekinusuqs) Judith, 2020. "From principles to action: Community-based entrepreneurship in the Toquaht Nation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(6).
    16. Devisscher, Tahia & Spies, Jillian & Griess, Verena C., 2021. "Time for change: Learning from community forests to enhance the resilience of multi-value forestry in British Columbia, Canada," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Robert Heilmayr & Cristian Echeverría & Eric F. Lambin, 2020. "Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 3(9), pages 701-709, September.
    18. Patrick José Jeetze & Isabelle Weindl & Justin Andrew Johnson & Pasquale Borrelli & Panos Panagos & Edna J. Molina Bacca & Kristine Karstens & Florian Humpenöder & Jan Philipp Dietrich & Sara Minoli &, 2023. "Projected landscape-scale repercussions of global action for climate and biodiversity protection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Carlo Rega & Alessandro Bonifazi, 2020. "The Rise of Resilience in Spatial Planning: A Journey through Disciplinary Boundaries and Contested Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    20. Simin Davoudi, 2003. "EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: from an analytical tool to a normative agenda," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(8), pages 979-999, December.
    21. Astrid Pérez Piñán & Elizabeth Vibert, 2019. "The View from the Farm: Gendered Contradictions of the Measurement Imperative in Global Goals," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 436-450, October.
    22. David Carruthers & Patricia Rodriguez, 2009. "Mapuche Protest, Environmental Conflict and Social Movement Linkage in Chile," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 743-760.
    23. Tore Sager, 2022. "Advocacy planning: were expectations fulfilled?," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 1205-1230, November.
    24. Bopp, Carlos & Engler, Alejandra & Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Arriagada, Rodrigo, 2020. "Are forest plantation subsidies affecting land use change and off-farm income? A farm-level analysis of Chilean small forest landowners," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    25. Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta & Kröger, Markus & Dressler, Wolfram, 2022. "From pro-growth and planetary limits to degrowth and decoloniality: An emerging bioeconomy policy and research agenda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    26. Cristian Pérez & Javier A. Simonetti, 2022. "Subsidy Accountability and Biodiversity Loss Drivers: Following the Money in the Chilean Silvoagricultural Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-12, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frantzeskaki, Niki & Buchel, Sophie & Spork, Charlie & Ludwig, Kathrin & Kok, Marcel T.J., 2019. "The Multiple Roles of ICLEI: Intermediating to Innovate Urban Biodiversity Governance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Agata Gurzawska & Markus Mäkinen & Philip Brey, 2017. "Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-26, September.
    3. Michelle Scobie, 2018. "Accountability in climate change governance and Caribbean SIDS," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 769-787, April.
    4. Galaz, Victor & Biermann, Frank & Folke, Carl & Nilsson, Måns & Olsson, Per, 2012. "Global environmental governance and planetary boundaries: An introduction," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-3.
    5. Brian G. Fitzgerald & Travis O'Doherty & Richard Moles & Bernadette O'Regan, 2015. "Quantitative Evaluation of Settlement Sustainability Policy (QESSP); Forward Planning for 26 Irish Settlements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Xuemei Bai & Syezlin Hasan & Lauren Seaby Andersen & Anders Bjørn & Şiir Kilkiş & Daniel Ospina & Jianguo Liu & Sarah E. Cornell & Oscar Sabag Muñoz & Ariane Bremond & Beatrice Crona & Fabrice DeClerc, 2024. "Translating Earth system boundaries for cities and businesses," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(2), pages 108-119, February.
    7. Vaissière, Anne-Charlotte & Levrel, Harold & Pioch, Sylvain & Carlier, Antoine, 2014. "Biodiversity offsets for offshore wind farm projects: The current situation in Europe," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 172-183.
    8. España, F. & Arriagada, R. & Melo, O. & Foster, W., 2022. "Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Dona Azizi, 0. "Access and allocation in food governance, a decadal view 2008–2018," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    10. Ackerschott, Adriana & Kohlhase, Esther & Vollmer, Anita & Hörisch, Jacob & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2023. "Steering of land use in the context of sustainable development: A systematic review of economic instruments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Marilena Papageorgiou, 2025. "Spatial Planning for Tourism Destinations Resilient to Climate Change," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer, 2017. "Responsible Innovation and the Innovation of Responsibility: Governing Sustainable Development in a Globalized World," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 227-243, June.
    13. Ashton, Lisa, 2022. "A framework for promoting natural climate solutions in the agriculture sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Teresa Kupczyk & Andrzej Wiatrak & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Joanna Kubicka, 2022. "Evaluation of Corporate Sustainability Strategies and Practices in this Area in the Opinion of Employees – A Comparative Analysis in Poland and India," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 308-322.
    15. Shaikh, M. Abdullah & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Geyik, Ozge & Bryan, Brett A., 2024. "Assessing global agri-food system exceedance of national cropland limits for linking responsible consumption and production under SDG 12," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    16. Teresa Kupczyk & Elwira Gross-Golacka & Joanna Kubicka, 2023. "Training Employees in Sustainability and Assessing their Ability to Implement Bottom-up Changes in Companies for the Green Revolution – A Comparative Analysis in Poland and India," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 94-107.
    17. Yurii Vitkovskyi & Marcin Budzinski & Tetiana Kviatko & Joanna Kubicka & Maria Zralek, 2024. "Peculiarities of Ensuring Sustainable Development of Ukraine in the Context of Socio-Political Challenges," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special B), pages 473-492.
    18. Verbruggen, Aviel, 2013. "Revocability and reversibility in societal decision-making," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 20-27.
    19. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K. Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Post-Print hal-03466563, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.