IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v156y2025ics0264837725001541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polycultural food production in temperate woodlands: Multifactorial benefits and political-economic barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Hirth, Steffen
  • Drlička, Ivan
  • Paterson, Matthew
  • Thomas, Paul W.

Abstract

Given the need to produce sufficient food while meeting net zero targets and protecting biodiversity, there is renewed impetus to expand woodland-based food systems in the Global North, including agroforestry and forest gardening. Typically, however, agriculture, forestry, and conservation are separated spatially, as well as conceptually, and afforestation policies insufficiently consider the integration of edibles into forest management, or woody species into agriculture. We review the scientific evidence on the benefits of woodland-based food systems in temperate climates in relation to four aspects: climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity restoration, food production, and social benefits. Findings suggest high potential of enhancing ecological and cultural ecosystem services through woody polyculture. However, an analysis of barriers and enablers of woodland-based food systems also shows that the productivist and monocultural approaches dominating agriculture in and for the Global North are a barrier to transforming the agri-food system towards more complex polycultural systems with woody species. Therefore, we discuss the conditions for making woody polyculture viable, upscaling these systems, and yielding multifactorial benefits at large-scale in relation to the wider political economy. We conclude that significant transformational rather than incremental shifts are needed, most notably regarding the practical and financial valuation of ecosystem services.

Suggested Citation

  • Hirth, Steffen & Drlička, Ivan & Paterson, Matthew & Thomas, Paul W., 2025. "Polycultural food production in temperate woodlands: Multifactorial benefits and political-economic barriers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001541
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001541
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:156:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.