IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v155y2025ics026483772500119x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unequal partnerships: Asymmetrical effects of urban economic linkages on land-use efficiency in 284 cities, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Shuyu
  • Wei, Fei
  • Zhang, Yanji
  • Li, Yayu
  • Zhu, Lingjia
  • Guo, Huagui

Abstract

As urbanization progresses, efficient land resource management is essential for sustainable urban development. While existing studies emphasize the positive impact of urban economic linkages (UEL) on urban land-use efficiency (ULUE), they often assume equal partnerships, overlooking the asymmetric nature of UEL. This study uses a modified gravity model and super-efficiency SBM model to explore the impact of unequal economic linkages within the UEL network on ULUE across 284 Chinese cities from 2002 to 2021. The findings reveal that ULUE increased until 2017 but declined thereafter. Cities in the southeastern coastal regions show higher ULUE, while those in the northeast exhibit lower efficiency. The Tobit model analysis indicates that cities with greater dominance in the UEL network tend to have higher ULUE, while those more dependent on external economies experience lower ULUE. Robustness checks confirm the stability of these results across different model specifications. The study underscores the importance of fostering more balanced economic linkages and advocates for policy reforms aimed at enhancing urban economic integration to improve ULUE across cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Shuyu & Wei, Fei & Zhang, Yanji & Li, Yayu & Zhu, Lingjia & Guo, Huagui, 2025. "Unequal partnerships: Asymmetrical effects of urban economic linkages on land-use efficiency in 284 cities, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500119x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107585
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772500119X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107585?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s026483772500119x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.