IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v138y2024ics0264837723004933.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land use policy impacts on effective farmland planting area: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yu, Shengnan
  • Qi, Jiaguo
  • Zhang, Xiaokang
  • Pueppke, Steven G.
  • Ou, Weixin
  • Liu, Huanjun
  • Cai, Xiumin
  • Ren, Tingting

Abstract

Farmland use policy in China has evolved substantially over the past 70 years, undergoing five stages from communal (1950 s-1980 s) to household-based (1980 s-1990 s), land circulation (1990 s-2000 s), family farms (2000 s-2010 s), and then cooperative systems (2010 s-present). Among many benefits and consequences that have been explored in previous studies, an overlooked impact is the effective farmland planting area (EFPA), resulting from farmland fragmentation at different stages. We used remotely sensed imagery to quantify farmland fragmentation and EFPA in a representative agricultural area in northeast China. Specifically, we used the K-means (WKKM) and the regression decision trees (CART) classification methods to extract patch size of planted areas and crop planted information in the Google Earth Engine (GEE) environment, and compared the results with field measurements to assess the classification accuracy, and calculated the EFPA. The results showed that the total number of patches increased rapidly after the dissolution of the communal system but declined until the cooperative policy was implemented. The EFPA was negatively related to the number of patches, with an average of 90% EFPA during the commune period, ∼70% in the household responsibility period and ∼86% during the cooperative period. In conclusion, land use policy played a key role in balancing the EFPA and farmers’ incentives and thus affected the EFPA in northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu, Shengnan & Qi, Jiaguo & Zhang, Xiaokang & Pueppke, Steven G. & Ou, Weixin & Liu, Huanjun & Cai, Xiumin & Ren, Tingting, 2024. "Land use policy impacts on effective farmland planting area: A case study in Heilongjiang Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004933
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723004933
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.107027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:138:y:2024:i:c:s0264837723004933. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.