IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v104y2021ics0264837721001046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alignment of standards through semantic tools – The case of land administration

Author

Listed:
  • Stubkjær, Erik
  • Çağdaş, Volkan

Abstract

The fact that both the ISO 19152:2012 Land Administration Domain Model (LADM) and the OGC 15–111r1 Land and Infrastructure Conceptual Model Standard (LandInfra) exist within the domain of Land Administration, calls for a mediating platform, which could support an alignment of the standards. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate, how semantic tools have been used to establish such platform.

Suggested Citation

  • Stubkjær, Erik & Çağdaş, Volkan, 2021. "Alignment of standards through semantic tools – The case of land administration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001046
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721001046
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koraljka Golub & Douglas Tudhope & Marcia Lei Zeng & Maja Žumer, 2014. "Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems: Functionality, use, and attributes," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(9), pages 1901-1916, September.
    2. Daniel Kless & Simon Milton & Edmund Kazmierczak & Jutta Lindenthal, 2015. "Thesaurus and ontology structure: Formal and pragmatic differences and similarities," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(7), pages 1348-1366, July.
    3. Marcia Lei Zeng & Lois Mai Chan, 2004. "Trends and issues in establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 55(5), pages 377-395, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Vlachidis & Douglas Tudhope, 2016. "A knowledge‐based approach to Information Extraction for semantic interoperability in the archaeology domain," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(5), pages 1138-1152, May.
    2. Qingqiang Wu & Yichen Kuang & Qingqi Hong & Yingying She, 2019. "Frontier knowledge discovery and visualization in cancer field based on KOS and LDA," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 979-1010, March.
    3. Wei Du & Raymond Yiu Keung Lau & Jian Ma & Wei Xu, 2015. "A multi-faceted method for science classification schemes (SCSs) mapping in networking scientific resources," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 2035-2056, December.
    4. Jan Pawlowski & Markus Bick & René Peinl & Stefan Thalmann & Ronald Maier & Lars Hetmank & Paul Kruse & Malte Martensen & Henri Pirkkalainen, 2014. "Social Knowledge Environments," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 6(2), pages 81-88, April.
    5. Wei Du & Xusen Cheng & Chen Yang & Jianshan Sun & Jian Ma, 2017. "Establishing interoperability among knowledge organization systems for research management: a social network approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(3), pages 1489-1506, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:104:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.