IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joaced/v42y2018icp1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student and professor use of publisher test banks and implications for fair play

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Christine
  • Crumbley, D. Larry

Abstract

This study examines whether student access to publisher test banks (PTBs) impairs the ability of PTB multiple-choice questions to distinguish between students who understand the material being tested and those who do not. We develop and validate a detection technique that can be used to detect students who use PTBs to memorize question-specific cues and correct answers. Results indicate that a significant number of students (48 percent) use PTBs and that use results in a performance advantage (approximately 30 percent) on exams. Results indicate that student use of PTBs may significantly impair the ability of a professor, who uses PTBs to create in-class exams, to distinguish between students who understand the material and students who do not understand the material. Results serve to inform professors who were either unaware of student access to PTBs, or who were unaware of the extent with which student access to PTBs can impair fair play in the classroom. We discuss the pedagogical implications that arise from our findings and provide some insight about how fair play may be restored in the short- and long-run.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Christine & Crumbley, D. Larry, 2018. "Student and professor use of publisher test banks and implications for fair play," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:42:y:2018:i:c:p:1-16
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575116300434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2017.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bergner, Jason & Filzen, Joshua J. & Simkin, Mark G., 2016. "Why use multiple choice questions with excess information?," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-12.
    2. Mauricio Romero & Ã lvaro Riascos & Diego Jara, 2015. "On the Optimality of Answer-Copying Indices," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 40(5), pages 435-453, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith, Kenneth J. & Emerson, David J. & Mauldin, Shawn, 2021. "Online cheating at the intersection of the dark triad and fraud diamond," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Hickey, Anna, 2019. "Accounting education literature review (2018)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-27.
    3. Golden, Joanna & Kohlbeck, Mark, 2020. "Addressing cheating when using test bank questions in online Classes," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2017. "Accounting education literature review (2016)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1-31.
    2. Sandip Sinharay, 2016. "Person Fit Analysis in Computerized Adaptive Testing Using Tests for a Change Point," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 41(5), pages 521-549, October.
    3. Joseph B. Lang, 2023. "A Randomization P-Value Test for Detecting Copying on Multiple-Choice Exams," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 48(3), pages 296-319, June.
    4. Sandip Sinharay, 2017. "Detection of Item Preknowledge Using Likelihood Ratio Test and Score Test," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 42(1), pages 46-68, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:42:y:2018:i:c:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accounting-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.