IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jmvana/v12y1982i1p155-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Note on Creasy's confidence limits for the gradient in the linear functional relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Schneeweiss, H.

Abstract

An apparent gap in the proof of Creasy's t test is filled and some false statements on this topic, found in the literature, are corrected. Creasy's test is shown to be identical with Williams' t test. The latter can be generalized to the multivariate case of a linear functional relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Schneeweiss, H., 1982. "Note on Creasy's confidence limits for the gradient in the linear functional relationship," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 155-158, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:12:y:1982:i:1:p:155-158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0047-259X(82)90089-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kasala, Subramanyam & Mathew, Thomas, 1997. "Exact confidence regions and tests in some linear functional relationships," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 325-328, March.
    2. Liang Yan & Rui Wang & Xingzhong Xu, 2017. "Fiducial inference in the classical errors-in-variables model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 93-114, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jmvana:v:12:y:1982:i:1:p:155-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.