IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaitra/v102y2022ics0969699722000448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of practitioners’ perceptions of a security risk assessment methodology in air traffic management projects

Author

Listed:
  • Bernsmed, Karin
  • Bour, Guillaume
  • Lundgren, Martin
  • Bergström, Erik

Abstract

Cyber security is a key enabler for safe Air Traffic Management (ATM). This paper presents results from an empirical study, in which we have investigated and evaluated the use of the Security Risk Assessment Methodology for SESAR (SecRAM) in European ATM research and development projects. The study was performed with the intention to find and document common issues and aspects that could be improved in the methodology. The results from the study reveal that while most of the practitioners had a positive perception of the methodology itself, they were less satisfied with the process of applying it in their projects. Based on the results, we provide a number of recommendations, which aim to improve the security risk assessment process in the ATM domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernsmed, Karin & Bour, Guillaume & Lundgren, Martin & Bergström, Erik, 2022. "An evaluation of practitioners’ perceptions of a security risk assessment methodology in air traffic management projects," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:102:y:2022:i:c:s0969699722000448
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102223
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969699722000448
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102223?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tor Stålhane & Guttorm Sindre, 2014. "An Experimental Comparison of System Diagrams and Textual Use Cases for the Identification of Safety Hazards," International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design (IJISMD), IGI Global, vol. 5(1), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaitra:v:102:y:2022:i:c:s0969699722000448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-air-transport-management/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.