IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jaecon/v82y2026i1s0165410126000406.html

Do investor preferences affect analyst research? Evidence from Chinese dual-listed shares

Author

Listed:
  • Matsumoto, Dawn
  • Zhang, Jenny Li
  • Zheng, Yuxiang

Abstract

We examine whether brokerages cater to investors’ preferences and beliefs when producing analyst reports. We leverage a unique feature of the Chinese market — firms whose shares are dual-listed on a Chinese stock exchange (A-shares) as well as on the Hong Kong stock exchange (H-shares). We rely on the segmented nature of these two markets — with A-shares primarily traded by Chinese investors and H-shares by foreign investors — and the assumption that Chinese and foreign investors have divergent preferences and beliefs. We find that A-share analyst reports discuss more government-related issues, less valuation-related information, and have more positive tone and more optimistic recommendations relative to H-share reports, within the same firm-year-month and holding constant the brokerage firm. We find consistent evidence when examining differences between analyst reports written in Chinese versus English within the same share market. Overall, this paper presents evidence supporting a catering theory for the production of analyst research.

Suggested Citation

  • Matsumoto, Dawn & Zhang, Jenny Li & Zheng, Yuxiang, 2026. "Do investor preferences affect analyst research? Evidence from Chinese dual-listed shares," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:82:y:2026:i:1:s0165410126000406
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2026.101897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165410126000406
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jacceco.2026.101897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:82:y:2026:i:1:s0165410126000406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jae .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.