IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v42y2026i2p602-615.html

Forecasting electoral violence

Author

Listed:
  • Randahl, David
  • Leis, Maxine
  • Gåsste, Tim
  • Fjelde, Hanne
  • Hegre, Håvard
  • Lindberg, Staffan I.
  • Wilson, Steven

Abstract

Electoral violence remains a significant challenge worldwide. It not only threatens to undermine the legitimacy and fairness of electoral outcomes, but often has serious repercussions on political stability broadly. The ability to prevent electoral violence is critical for safeguarding democracy and ensuring peaceful transitions of political power. Predicting which elections are at risk of violence is a crucial step in effective prevention. In this study, we develop a set of machine-learning models to forecast the likelihood of electoral violence worldwide. Using diverse data sources, which include economic indicators, the history of electoral violence, political instability, and digital vulnerability, we predict the risk of electoral violence on a scale ranging from no violence to severe violence. Our final forecasts are produced by combining constituent models into an ensemble using a genetic algorithm. Out-of-sample evaluation of the system shows that the final model accurately distinguishes between different levels of risk. After validating our system on historical data, we generate out-of-sample probabilistic forecasts for national-level elections in 2025 and 2026. This research contributes to the field of political violence prediction by providing a medium-term data-driven forecasting tool for electoral violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Randahl, David & Leis, Maxine & Gåsste, Tim & Fjelde, Hanne & Hegre, Håvard & Lindberg, Staffan I. & Wilson, Steven, 2026. "Forecasting electoral violence," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 602-615.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:602-615
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.09.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207025000871
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.09.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Butcher & Benjamin E. Goldsmith & Sascha Nanlohy & Arcot Sowmya & David Muchlinski, 2020. "Introducing the Targeted Mass Killing Data Set for the Study and Forecasting of Mass Atrocities," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 64(7-8), pages 1524-1547, August.
    2. Jung, Jaesung & Broadwater, Robert P., 2014. "Current status and future advances for wind speed and power forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 762-777.
    3. Hanne Fjelde & Kristine Höglund, 2022. "Introducing the Deadly Electoral Conflict Dataset (DECO)," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(1), pages 162-185, January.
    4. Paola Vesco & Håvard Hegre & Michael Colaresi & Remco Bastiaan Jansen & Adeline Lo & Gregor Reisch & Nils B. Weidmann, 2022. "United they stand: Findings from an escalation prediction competition," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 860-896, July.
    5. Oka, Natsuko, 2009. "Ethnicity and Elections under Authoritarianism: The Case of Kazakhstan," IDE Discussion Papers 194, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Mueller, Hannes & Rauh, Christopher, 2018. "Reading Between the Lines: Prediction of Political Violence Using Newspaper Text," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 112(2), pages 358-375, May.
    7. Håvard Hegre & Curtis Bell & Michael Colaresi & Mihai Croicu & Frederick Hoyles & Remco Jansen & Maxine Ria Leis & Angelica Lindqvist-McGowan & David Randahl & Espen Geelmuyden Rød & Paola Vesco, 2021. "ViEWS2020: Revising and evaluating the ViEWS political Violence Early-Warning System," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(3), pages 599-611, May.
    8. Kathleen Klaus, 2020. "Raising the stakes: Land titling and electoral stability in Kenya," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 30-45, January.
    9. Fjelde, Hanne & Smidt, Hannah M., 2022. "Protecting the Vote? Peacekeeping Presence and the Risk of Electoral Violence," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 1113-1132, July.
    10. Fjelde, Hanne & Höglund, Kristine, 2016. "Electoral Institutions and Electoral Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(2), pages 297-320, April.
    11. Christian Opitz & Hanne Fjelde & Kristine Höglund, 2013. "Including peace: the influence of electoral management bodies on electoral violence," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 713-731, November.
    12. Lars-Erik Cederman & Simon Hug & Lutz F. Krebs, 2010. "Democratization and civil war: Empirical evidence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 47(4), pages 377-394, July.
    13. Hyde, Susan D. & Marinov, Nikolay, 2012. "Which Elections Can Be Lost?," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 191-210, April.
    14. Harish, S. P. & Little, Andrew T., 2017. "The Political Violence Cycle," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(2), pages 237-255, May.
    15. Ursula Daxecker, 2020. "Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 156-170, January.
    16. Hegre, Håvard, 2001. "Toward a Democratic Civil Peace? Democracy, Political Change, and Civil War, 1816–1992," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(1), pages 33-48, March.
    17. Hanne Fjelde, 2020. "Political party strength and electoral violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 140-155, January.
    18. Sarah Birch & Ursula Daxecker & Kristine Höglund, 2020. "Electoral violence: An introduction," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 3-14, January.
    19. Montgomery, Jacob M. & Hollenbach, Florian M. & Ward, Michael D., 2012. "Improving Predictions using Ensemble Bayesian Model Averaging," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 271-291, July.
    20. Rubén Ruiz-Rufino & Sarah Birch, 2020. "The effect of alternation in power on electoral intimidation in democratizing regimes," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 126-139, January.
    21. Muchlinski, David & Siroky, David & He, Jingrui & Kocher, Matthew, 2016. "Comparing Random Forest with Logistic Regression for Predicting Class-Imbalanced Civil War Onset Data," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 87-103, January.
    22. Ward Berenschot, 2020. "Patterned pogroms: Patronage networks as infrastructure for electoral violence in India and Indonesia," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 171-184, January.
    23. Rød, Espen Geelmuyden & Gåsste, Tim & Hegre, Håvard, 2024. "A review and comparison of conflict early warning systems," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 96-112.
    24. Michael Wahman & Edward Goldring, 2020. "Pre-election violence and territorial control: Political dominance and subnational election violence in polarized African electoral systems," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 93-110, January.
    25. Sarah Birch & David Muchlinski, 2020. "The Dataset of Countries at Risk of Electoral Violence," Terrorism and Political Violence, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 217-236, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Edward Flores & Irfan Nooruddin, 2023. "Why incumbents perpetrate election violence during civil war," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(5), pages 533-553, September.
    2. Turnbull, Megan, 2021. "When armed groups refuse to carry out election violence: Evidence from Nigeria," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    3. Sarah Birch & Ursula Daxecker & Kristine Höglund, 2020. "Electoral violence: An introduction," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 3-14, January.
    4. Richard W Frank, 2025. "Explaining election violence: A meta-analysis," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(7), pages 2389-2407, December.
    5. Kathleen Klaus & Megan Turnbull, 2025. "Democracy dismissed: When leaders and citizens choose election violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(5), pages 1447-1462, September.
    6. Saibu, Ghadafi, 2023. "On the edge: Delays in election results and electoral violence in Sub-Sahara Africa," IDOS Discussion Papers 19/2023, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Gudlaug Olafsdottir, 2025. "The conditions for reducing electoral violence through constitutional reform," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(7), pages 2273-2289, December.
    8. Tabea Palmtag & Katrin Paula & Tobias Rommel, 2025. "Beyond economic development? Foreign direct investment and pre-election violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(2), pages 246-261, March.
    9. Elfversson, Emma, 2025. "Contentious cities? Urban growth and electoral violence in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Axel Dreher & Jingke Pan & Christina Schneider, 2025. "Foreign Aid and Targeted Political Violence," CESifo Working Paper Series 11970, CESifo.
    11. Hanne Fjelde, 2020. "Political party strength and electoral violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 140-155, January.
    12. Noyonika Das, 2025. "Engineered non-contestation: Deterring electoral contestation using violence in local elections," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(5), pages 1548-1564, September.
    13. Ursula Daxecker, 2020. "Unequal votes, unequal violence: Malapportionment and election violence in India," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 156-170, January.
    14. Carl Müller-Crepon, 2022. "Local ethno-political polarization and election violence in majoritarian vs. proportional systems," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 59(2), pages 242-258, March.
    15. Jana Krause, 2020. "Restrained or constrained? Elections, communal conflicts, and variation in sexual violence," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 185-198, January.
    16. Andrea Ruggeri & Ursula Daxecker & Neeraj Prasad, 2025. "Political violence in democracies: An Introduction," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(5), pages 1363-1375, September.
    17. Jansesberger, Viktoria, 2024. "Storms, floods, landslides and elections in India's growing metropolises: Hotbeds for political protest?," Working Papers 28, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    18. Johan Brosché & Hanne Fjelde & Kristine Höglund, 2020. "Electoral violence and the legacy of authoritarian rule in Kenya and Zambia," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 57(1), pages 111-125, January.
    19. HÃ¥vard Hegre & Paola Vesco & Michael Colaresi & Jonas Vestby & Alexa Timlick & Noorain Syed Kazmi & Angelica Lindqvist-McGowan & Friederike Becker & Marco Binetti & Tobias Bodentien & Tobias Bohne & , 2025. "The 2023/24 VIEWS Prediction challenge: Predicting the number of fatalities in armed conflict, with uncertainty," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(6), pages 2070-2087, November.
    20. Rød, Espen Geelmuyden & Gåsste, Tim & Hegre, Håvard, 2024. "A review and comparison of conflict early warning systems," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 96-112.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:602-615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.