IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/intfor/v42y2026i2p297-314.html

Can we protect time series data while maintaining accurate forecasts?

Author

Listed:
  • Bale, Cameron D.
  • Schneider, Matthew J.
  • Lee, Jinwook

Abstract

We evaluate the usefulness of protected time series by exploring how privacy protection affects forecast accuracy. Using both simulated and real-world time series data sets, we test various privacy methods, including a proposed swapping-based method (k-nTS+) designed to maintain time series features, a differentially private method, and an approach based on sharing model weights trained on unprotected data. Based on forecasts from both simple and machine learning models, we find that none of the privacy methods can consistently maintain forecast accuracy at an acceptable level of privacy. We also show that sharing model weights enables accurate forecasts, but accurate forecasts can be used to uncover the identities of protected time series. To overcome these problems, we transform continuous time series into bounded rates to increase the similarities of features, values, and forecasts across time series. This enables our proposed method to produce protected data with a reduction in average forecast accuracy of just 6%. Overall, we acknowledge that except under certain conditions, generating time series with acceptable privacy levels is incompatible with the goal of obtaining accurate forecasts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bale, Cameron D. & Schneider, Matthew J. & Lee, Jinwook, 2026. "Can we protect time series data while maintaining accurate forecasts?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 297-314.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:297-314
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169207025000019
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:intfor:v:42:y:2026:i:2:p:297-314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijforecast .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.