IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the numerical evaluation of the distribution of aggregate claims and its stop-loss premiums


  • Gerber, Hans U.


No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerber, Hans U., 1982. "On the numerical evaluation of the distribution of aggregate claims and its stop-loss premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 13-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:1:y:1982:i:1:p:13-18

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Sundt, Bjorn, 2002. "Recursive evaluation of aggregate claims distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 297-322, June.
    2. Psarrakos, Georgios & Politis, Konstadinos, 2008. "Tail bounds for the joint distribution of the surplus prior to and at ruin," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 163-176, February.
    3. Bae, Taehan & Kim, Changki & Kulperger, Reginald J., 2009. "Securitization of motor insurance loss rate risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 48-58, February.
    4. David Cummins & Christopher Lewis & Richard Phillips, 1999. "Pricing Excess-of-Loss Reinsurance Contracts against Cat as trophic Loss," NBER Chapters,in: The Financing of Catastrophe Risk, pages 93-148 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Vilar, Jose L., 2000. "Arithmetization of distributions and linear goal programming," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 113-122, August.
    6. repec:spr:compst:v:69:y:2009:i:3:p:497-508 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Paul Embrechts & Marco Frei, 2009. "Panjer recursion versus FFT for compound distributions," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 69(3), pages 497-508, July.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:1:y:1982:i:1:p:13-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.