IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v127y2026ics0167668726000120.html

Mitigating ambiguity in earthquake catastrophe insurance pricing: A model averaging and α-Maxmin approach

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Yunxian
  • Yang, Xinmei
  • Zi, Zhilan
  • Liu, Hefei

Abstract

Ambiguity poses a key challenge in the pricing of catastrophe insurance, as it leads to higher premiums compared to unambiguous risks. This paper proposes a novel approach that integrates model averaging (MA) techniques with an extended α-maxmin framework to address ambiguity in insurance pricing decisions. Specifically, we introduce three MA weighting strategies within a quantile regression setting to mitigate estimation uncertainty and extend the α-maxmin framework to formally incorporate both the insurer’s ambiguity aversion and survival constraints into the pricing process. Using earthquake loss data from China (1974-2023), we show that MA improves predictive accuracy and mitigates affordability issues by reducing ambiguity-induced premium inflation, with jackknife model averaging lowering net premiums by 15.69%. Sensitivity analyzes indicate that stronger ambiguity aversion (higher α), tighter survival constraints (lower θ), and a higher cost of capital (higher δ) all necessitate larger capital reserves to counter bankruptcy risk, thereby raising premiums, with the first two factors exerting a more pronounced influence. The paper offers a coherent toolkit for integrating model uncertainty into catastrophe insurance pricing with practical relevance for risk management and regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Yunxian & Yang, Xinmei & Zi, Zhilan & Liu, Hefei, 2026. "Mitigating ambiguity in earthquake catastrophe insurance pricing: A model averaging and α-Maxmin approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:127:y:2026:i:c:s0167668726000120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2026.103222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668726000120
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2026.103222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:127:y:2026:i:c:s0167668726000120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.