IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v58y2021ics0268401219317025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affordances and constraints processes of smart service systems: Insights from the case of seaport security in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Effah, John
  • Amankwah-Sarfo, Fred
  • Boateng, Richard

Abstract

Although smart service systems have received increasing attention in information systems research, their affordances and constraints processes are less studied. In this study, we draw on interpretive case study methodology and technology affordances and constraints theory to investigate a smart service system use for seaport security in Ghana. With insights from the case of Ghana, we introduce an affordance constraints process as a framework to complement the existing affordance actualisation process framework in information systems. Thus, this study contributes to affordance theory with a new constraints process. The study’s findings show that smart service systems for seaport security afford autonomous access control, real-time security monitoring, and autonomous data capturing for analytics and reporting. However, such affordances can be constrained by power and internet outages, limited storage capacity, and device breakdowns. From these findings, we discuss implications for theory, research, and practice as well as limitations and directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Effah, John & Amankwah-Sarfo, Fred & Boateng, Richard, 2021. "Affordances and constraints processes of smart service systems: Insights from the case of seaport security in Ghana," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:58:y:2021:i:c:s0268401219317025
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401219317025
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102204?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:58:y:2021:i:c:s0268401219317025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.