IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v1y2007i4p257-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The estimation of the number of lost multi-copy documents: A new type of informetrics theory

Author

Listed:
  • Egghe, L.
  • Proot, G.

Abstract

A probabilistic model is presented to estimate the number of lost multi-copy documents, based on retrieved ones. For this, we only need the number of retrieved documents of which we have one copy and the number of retrieved documents of which we have two copies. If we also have the number of retrieved documents of which we have three copies then we are also able to estimate the number of copies of the documents that ever existed (assumed that this number is fixed over all documents). Simulations prove the stability of the model. The model is applied to the estimation of the number of lost printed programmes of Jesuit theatre plays in the Provincia Flandro-Belgica before 1773. This Jesuit province was an administrative entity of the order, which was territorially slightly larger in extent than present day Flanders, the northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. It is noted that the functional model Pj for the fraction of retrieved documents with j copies is a size-frequency function satisfying (Pj+1/Pj)/(Pj/Pj−1)<1 for all j. It is further noted that the “classical” size-frequency functions are different: Lotka's function satisfies the opposite inequality and the decreasing exponential one gives always 1 for the above ratio, hence showing that we are in a new type of informetrics theory. We also provide a mathematical rationale for the “book historical law” stating that the probability to lose a copy of a multi-copy document (i.e. an edition) is an increasing function of the size of the edition. The paper closes with some open problems and a description of other potential applications of this probabilistic model.

Suggested Citation

  • Egghe, L. & Proot, G., 2007. "The estimation of the number of lost multi-copy documents: A new type of informetrics theory," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 257-268.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:4:p:257-268
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157707000351
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Burrell, Quentin L., 2008. "Some comments on “The estimation of lost multi-copy documents: A new type of informetrics theory” by Egghe and Proot," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 101-105.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multi-copy document; Book historical law;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:1:y:2007:i:4:p:257-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.