IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i4s1751157725001075.html

Drivers and penalties of retraction: An empirical study of Chinese medical researchers

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Fang
  • Ren, Yanqing
  • Zhang, Ruhao
  • Feng, Lingzi
  • Wang, Lixue
  • Yuan, Junpeng

Abstract

This study quantitatively analyzes 373 researchers with retracted papers from 20 leading medical institutions in China and examines their characteristics, retraction drivers, and career impacts based on their publication histories. The results show that: (1) young researchers with retractions show weaker academic performance than their non-retracted peers, while senior researchers exhibit higher productivity, influence, and larger collaboration networks; (2) output-driven incentives strongly correlate with misconduct-related retractions, and younger researchers face higher misconduct risks; (3) peer pressure among researchers within the same institute does not significantly influence the institute’s overall retraction frequency; and (4) retractions significantly reduce citations (–41.5%), collaborations, and career mobility, with early career researchers being the most affected. Midcareer researchers suffer primarily from citation decline. (5) Retractions due to scientific error have a greater negative impact on the authors’ subsequent career development. Their annual citation numbers decrease by 61.8%, and the number of co-authors decreases by 23.6%, which are 1.6 times and 1.4 times the decreases in the academic misconduct group, respectively. These findings provide critical insights into current retraction trends.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Fang & Ren, Yanqing & Zhang, Ruhao & Feng, Lingzi & Wang, Lixue & Yuan, Junpeng, 2025. "Drivers and penalties of retraction: An empirical study of Chinese medical researchers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:4:s1751157725001075
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berggren, Christian & Karabag, Solmaz Filiz, 2019. "Scientific misconduct at an elite medical institute: The role of competing institutional logics and fragmented control," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 428-443.
    2. Fang Lei & Liang Du & Min Dong & Xuemei Liu, 2024. "Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7943-7958, December.
    3. Lingzi Feng & Junpeng Yuan & Liying Yang, 2020. "An observation framework for retracted publications in multiple dimensions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1445-1457, November.
    4. Cox, Adam & Craig, Russell & Tourish, Dennis, 2018. "Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 924-935.
    5. Sida Feng & Lingzi Feng & Fang Han & Ye Zhang & Yanqing Ren & Lixue Wang & Junpeng Yuan, 2024. "Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 4795-4817, August.
    6. Philippe Mongeon & Vincent Larivière, 2016. "Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co-authors' careers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(3), pages 535-542, March.
    7. Azoulay, Pierre & Bonatti, Alessandro & Krieger, Joshua L., 2017. "The career effects of scandal: Evidence from scientific retractions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9), pages 1552-1569.
    8. Bakthavachalam Elango & Marcin Kozak & Periyaswamy Rajendran, 2019. "Analysis of retractions in Indian science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1081-1094, May.
    9. Kiran Sharma & Satyam Mukherjee, 2024. "The ripple effect of retraction on an author’s collaboration network," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1519-1531, October.
    10. Kiran Sharma, 2021. "Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8363-8374, October.
    11. Mohan, Vijay, 2019. "On the use of blockchain-based mechanisms to tackle academic misconduct," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    12. Fabián Freijedo-Farinas & Alberto Ruano-Ravina & Mónica Pérez-Ríos & Joseph Ross & Cristina Candal-Pedreira, 2024. "Biomedical retractions due to misconduct in Europe: characterization and trends in the last 20 years," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(5), pages 2867-2882, May.
    13. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Jensen, Kyle & Murray, Fiona, 2012. "Governing knowledge in the scientific community: Exploring the role of retractions in biomedicine," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 276-290.
    14. Jodi Schneider & Di Ye & Alison M. Hill & Ashley S. Whitehorn, 2020. "Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2877-2913, December.
    15. Ali Ghorbi & Mohsen Fazeli-Varzaneh & Erfan Ghaderi-Azad & Marcel Ausloos & Marcin Kozak, 2021. "Retracted papers by Iranian authors: causes, journals, time lags, affiliations, collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7351-7371, September.
    16. Liu, Xiaojuan & Wang, Chenlin & Chen, Dar-Zen & Huang, Mu-Hsuan, 2022. "Exploring perception of retraction based on mentioned status in post-retraction citations," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    17. Qin Zhang & Hui-Zhen Fu, 2022. "Productivity patterns, collaboration and scientific careers of authors with retracted publications in clinical medicine," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1883-1901, April.
    18. Smriti Mallapaty, 2024. "China conducts first nationwide review of retractions and research misconduct," Nature, Nature, vol. 626(8000), pages 700-701, February.
    19. Wang, Dong & Chen, Sihan, 2025. "An empirical study of retractions due to honest errors: Exploring the relationship between error types and author teams," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    20. Martín-Martín, Alberto & Orduna-Malea, Enrique & Thelwall, Mike & Delgado López-Cózar, Emilio, 2018. "Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1160-1177.
    21. Shahan Ali Memon & Kinga Makovi & Bedoor AlShebli, 2025. "Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 1134-1146, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Santos-d’Amorim & Elías Sanz-Casado & Raimundo Nonato Macedo Santos, 2025. "Errors, questionable practices, or misconduct? A bibliometric and altmetric review covering two decades of retractions in Latin America," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(7), pages 3679-3706, July.
    2. Sida Feng & Lingzi Feng & Fang Han & Ye Zhang & Yanqing Ren & Lixue Wang & Junpeng Yuan, 2024. "Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 4795-4817, August.
    3. Eleonora Alabrese, 2022. "Bad Science: Retractions and Media Coverage," CESifo Working Paper Series 10195, CESifo.
    4. Kiran Sharma, 2024. "Over two decades of scientific misconduct in India: Retraction reasons and journal quality among inter-country and intra-country institutional collaboration," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7735-7757, December.
    5. Linna Li & Yiping Wu & Yu Wang, 2025. "Exposure of Academic Misconduct and Universities’ Innovation Output: Evidence from Retractions in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 200(3), pages 649-668, September.
    6. Ivan Heibi & Silvio Peroni, 2021. "A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: the Wakefield 1998 et al.'s case," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8433-8470, October.
    7. Marion Schmidt, 2024. "Why do some retracted articles continue to get cited?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7535-7563, December.
    8. Xu, Haifeng & Ding, Yi & Zhang, Cheng & Tan, Bernard C.Y., 2023. "Too official to be effective: An empirical examination of unofficial information channel and continued use of retracted articles," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    9. Horton, Joanne & Krishna Kumar, Dhanya & Wood, Anthony, 2020. "Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: The case of Professor James Hunton," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    10. Qin Zhang & Juneman Abraham & Hui-Zhen Fu, 2020. "Collaboration and its influence on retraction based on retracted publications during 1978–2017," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 213-232, October.
    11. Ivan Heibi & Silvio Peroni, 2022. "A protocol to gather, characterize and analyze incoming citations of retracted articles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Lingzi Feng & Junpeng Yuan & Liying Yang, 2020. "An observation framework for retracted publications in multiple dimensions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1445-1457, November.
    13. Tariq Ahmad Shah & Sumeer Gul & Saimah Bashir & Suhail Ahmad & Assumpció Huertas & Andrea Oliveira & Farzana Gulzar & Ashaq Hussain Najar & Kanu Chakraborty, 2021. "Influence of accessibility (open and toll-based) of scholarly publications on retractions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 4589-4606, June.
    14. Walsh, John P. & Lee, You-Na & Tang, Li, 2019. "Pathogenic organization in science: Division of labor and retractions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 444-461.
    15. Joëts, Marc & Mignon, Valérie, 2026. "Slaying the undead: How long does it take to kill zombie papers?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    16. Shahan Ali Memon & Kinga Makovi & Bedoor AlShebli, 2025. "Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 1134-1146, June.
    17. Devanath P. R. & Rupesh Kumar A., 2026. "Citation dynamics and altmetric trends of retracted publications in Indian-funded research: pre and post retraction analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 131(1), pages 443-464, January.
    18. Tom Coupé & W. Robert Reed, 2021. "Do Negative Replications Affect Citations?," Working Papers in Economics 21/14, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    19. N. Siva & P. Rajendran, 2023. "Retracted publications in BRICS countries: an analytical study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(12), pages 6313-6333, December.
    20. Gilles Grolleau & Naoufel Mzoughi, 2022. "How research institutions can make the best of scandals – once they become unavoidable," Post-Print hal-03908837, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:4:s1751157725001075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.