IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i3s1751157725000744.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do novel papers attract more social attention?

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, Jiaqi
  • Xie, Yundong
  • Wu, Qiang

Abstract

The proliferation of social media and the increasing emphasis on societal impact on research evaluation have highlighted the importance of understanding how scientific novelty influences public engagement. This study examines how the novelty of scientific research correlates with the social attention it garners. The analysis is based on a dataset comprising over 310,000 articles in economics and business published from 2012 to 2019. We use Altmetrics—comprising the Altmetric Attention Score, Mendeley, Twitter, Blogs, News, Facebook, and Wikipedia—to evaluate the social attention received by both novel and non-novel papers as defined by us. The results show that novel research consistently garners greater social attention, with particularly strong effects observed in top-tier journals and open-access publications. Our findings remain robust even when employing alternative measures of novelty and controlling for the citation count. Further analysis comparing outcomes across various Altmetric sources provides a comprehensive view of how different platforms reflect societal engagement with novel research. This study provides valuable insights into the societal attention of novel and original scientific research, offering a new perspective for academic publishing and research evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, Jiaqi & Xie, Yundong & Wu, Qiang, 2025. "Do novel papers attract more social attention?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:3:s1751157725000744
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:3:s1751157725000744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.