IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/infome/v19y2025i3s1751157725000392.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do intra- and inter-organisational collaboration affect research performance? Evidence from German universities

Author

Listed:
  • Garcia Chavez, Cecilia
  • Gruber, Sonia
  • Schubert, Torben

Abstract

This paper examines how organisational boundaries shape the relationship between collaboration and research performance in universities. Using meso-level co-authorship networks and matched registry data from 83 German universities between 2006 and 2019, this study advances the understanding of how organisational structures condition collaborative knowledge production and its research performance outcomes. By examining the contingency effects of intra- and inter-organisational networks, we offer new insights into the cost-benefit trade-offs of collaboration, highlighting the importance of balancing internal cohesion with external diversity. While intra-organisational networks reinforce strong relational ties that support existing knowledge, they may constrain the formation of novel knowledge combinations. Conversely, inter-organisational networks expand opportunities for new knowledge combinations, but at the cost of weaker ties, which may reduce the depth and stability of knowledge exchange. Our findings highlight the strategic value of integrating intra- and inter-organisational networks to optimise the research impact of universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Garcia Chavez, Cecilia & Gruber, Sonia & Schubert, Torben, 2025. "How do intra- and inter-organisational collaboration affect research performance? Evidence from German universities," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:3:s1751157725000392
    DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2025.101675
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157725000392
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.joi.2025.101675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:infome:v:19:y:2025:i:3:s1751157725000392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.